Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(python): Update join_where docs to clarify behaviour #18670

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 11, 2024

Conversation

adamreeve
Copy link
Contributor

This is a small change to the join_where docs to add that this behaves like an inner join, and emphasise that row order isn't preserved.

@github-actions github-actions bot added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation python Related to Python Polars labels Sep 11, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.92%. Comparing base (5c4e7e9) to head (0bc8f7e).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #18670      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   79.90%   79.92%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1512     1512              
  Lines      203203   203203              
  Branches     2891     2891              
==========================================
+ Hits       162379   162406      +27     
+ Misses      40274    40247      -27     
  Partials      550      550              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ritchie46 ritchie46 merged commit 9d01442 into pola-rs:main Sep 11, 2024
15 checks passed
@adamreeve adamreeve deleted the join_where_docs branch September 11, 2024 07:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation python Related to Python Polars
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants