-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs(python): Add missing Series
methods to API reference
#18312
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ | ||
========= | ||
Operators | ||
========= | ||
|
||
Polars supports native Python operators for all common operations; | ||
many of these operators are also available as methods on the :class:`Series` | ||
class. | ||
|
||
Comparison | ||
~~~~~~~~~~ | ||
|
||
.. currentmodule:: polars | ||
.. autosummary:: | ||
:toctree: api/ | ||
|
||
Series.eq | ||
Series.eq_missing | ||
Series.ge | ||
Series.gt | ||
Series.le | ||
Series.lt | ||
Series.ne | ||
Series.ne_missing | ||
|
||
Numeric | ||
~~~~~~~ | ||
|
||
.. autosummary:: | ||
:toctree: api/ | ||
|
||
Series.pow |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
would
aggregation
be a better section, as that's where it is forExpr
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the question and the quick review. Yes, I do think that's a better section - thanks for that.
It is in both
aggregation
andfunctions
forExpr
, so initially that was why I added it intocomputation
. Upon reflectionaggregation
is indeed much better suited. Will update now.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh it's in both for Expr? 🤔 maybe the
functions
one can be removed then?