-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 90
Support more placeholder types #25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
| extension Set: DefaultConstructible {} | ||
| extension Dictionary: DefaultConstructible {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These are a bit redundant as they are covered by AnyExpressibleByArrayLiteral and AnyExpressibleByDictionaryLiteral but could be kept and drop the AnyExpressible... ones
|
@iampatbrown Sorry for the delay. We're pretty busy at the moment, but this definitely looks interesting! Might be a week or two before we have time to think through the current implementation, and do feel free to ping us here if we neglect it for too long! |
@stephencelis No stress at all. Figured the implementation might need some thought :) |
* Add SwiftWASM to CI * wip * wip * wip
|
Closing this for now. The current works for the majority of cases and using an explicit placeholder when needed is fine. |
* Create an "unsafe" library. * wip * wip * wip * wip * wip * wip * wip * wip * wip Co-authored-by: Brandon Williams <mbrandonw@hey.com>
* wip * wip * wip * wip * wip
* Generate docs in CI * wip * Update documentation.yml * Update documentation.yml Co-authored-by: Stephen Celis <stephen@stephencelis.com>
|
@iampatbrown Down to revisit this? We've moved things around, so if you don't have time I can attempt to rebase, but also wanted to make sure there wasn't anything else that came to mind since you first opened this. |
|
@stephencelis I'd most likely redo with a 5.7 implementation as well. Can revisit this on the weekend if there's no rush. |
Thoughts on
_generatePlaceholder()supporting additional types?I haven't thought through this too much, just wanted to run it by you.