Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Coverage Provider from "c8" to "v8" in Vitest #2089

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 23, 2023

Conversation

tariqule
Copy link
Contributor

@tariqule tariqule commented Aug 22, 2023

Related Issues or Discussions

Fixes #

Summary

This pull request updates the coverage provider from the deprecated "c8" to the new default "v8" as required by Vitest. The change aligns the project with the new standard and avoids the deprecated warning that appeared when running yarn test.

More information can be found in the related Vitest pull request: vitest-dev/vitest/pull/3339.

Check List

  • yarn run prettier for formatting code and docs

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Aug 22, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
jotai ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Aug 22, 2023 3:50pm

@codesandbox-ci
Copy link

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit a193d53:

Sandbox Source
React Configuration
React Typescript Configuration
React Browserify Configuration
React Snowpack Configuration
Next.js Configuration
Next.js with custom Babel config Configuration
React with custom Babel config Configuration

@tariqule tariqule changed the title Replace Deprecated @vitest/coverage-c8 with @vitest/coverage-v8 Update Coverage Provider from "c8" to "v8" in Vitest Aug 22, 2023
@dai-shi dai-shi merged commit 80fe4b5 into pmndrs:main Aug 23, 2023
28 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants