-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
Link to plugwise v1.6.2 and adapt #784
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Implement OptionsFlow fix for HA 2024.12.0
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several updates across multiple files, including a new version entry in the changelog for v0.55.2, which highlights the integration of plugwise version 1.6.2. Key modifications include refactoring the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)
5-7: LGTM! Consider adding more details about the control_state improvements.The changelog entry follows the established format and correctly documents the dependency update. However, it would be helpful to elaborate on the specific Adam
control_stateimprovements that were implemented.Consider expanding the changelog entry to:
- Link to plugwise [v1.6.2](https://github.com/plugwise/python-plugwise/releases/tag/v1.6.2), implementing Adam `control_state` related improvements. + Link to plugwise [v1.6.2](https://github.com/plugwise/python-plugwise/releases/tag/v1.6.2), implementing Adam `control_state` improvements: + - <list specific improvements> + - <list any breaking changes if applicable>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)custom_components/plugwise/climate.py(2 hunks)custom_components/plugwise/manifest.json(1 hunks)tests/components/plugwise/fixtures/m_adam_heating/all_data.json(1 hunks)tests/components/plugwise/fixtures/m_adam_jip/all_data.json(4 hunks)tests/components/plugwise/fixtures/m_adam_multiple_devices_per_zone/all_data.json(6 hunks)tests/components/plugwise/snapshots/test_diagnostics.ambr(6 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
custom_components/plugwise/manifest.json (1)
10-11: Version updates look appropriate
The version updates align with the PR objective to link to plugwise v1.6.2. However, let's verify there are no breaking changes in the new version.
✅ Verification successful
Version updates are safe to proceed
The changelog for plugwise v1.6.2 shows only improvements to control state processing with no breaking changes:
- Changed value from
offtoidleto align with HA CoreHVACActionstates - Enhanced firmware compatibility handling
- Moved a fix from integration to backend library
Additionally, no security vulnerabilities were found for the package.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any breaking changes or deprecation notices in the changelog
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/plugwise/python-plugwise/main/CHANGELOG.md | grep -A 5 "1.6.2"
# Check for any security advisories
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: PIP, package: "plugwise") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
Length of output: 847
tests/components/plugwise/fixtures/m_adam_heating/all_data.json (1)
196-196: Control state change aligns with plugwise v1.6.2 update
The change from "off" to "idle" appears to be part of a standardization of control states across devices. Let's verify this is consistent with the plugwise library's expectations.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information to verify if there was a change from "off" to "idle" state.
Let me search for the actual mapping between control states and HVAC actions to verify this change.
Let me try one final search to find the mapping between control states and HVAC actions.
Control state "idle" is the correct state for the Plugwise integration
Based on the code analysis, "idle" is the correct control state used consistently across the Plugwise integration. The climate.py implementation maps control states directly to HVACAction values, and "idle" is the standard state when the system is neither heating nor cooling. All test fixtures consistently use "idle" as the control state, and there's no evidence of "off" being used as a valid control state.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for control state definitions in the plugwise library
rg -A 5 "control_state.*idle"
# Check for any related test cases
ast-grep --pattern 'def test_$_control_state($_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 7406
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for historical control state definitions with "off"
rg -A 5 "control_state.*off"
# Search for any control state enums or constants
rg -A 5 "control_state.*=|CONTROL_STATE"
Length of output: 2360
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for HVAC action mappings and control state handling
ast-grep --pattern 'HVACAction($_)'
# Look for any test files that might contain control state assertions
rg -A 5 "assert.*control_state"
# Check git history for changes in the fixture file
git log -p tests/components/plugwise/fixtures/m_adam_heating/all_data.json
Length of output: 151
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for HVAC action and control state related code
rg -A 10 "HVACAction" custom_components/plugwise/climate.py
# Look for any enum or mapping definitions related to control states
rg -A 10 "class.*HVACAction|HVAC_MODE_.*=|HVACAction.*=" custom_components/plugwise/
# Check the test fixtures for both "idle" and "off" states
rg --type json "control_state.*(idle|off)" tests/components/plugwise/fixtures/
Length of output: 3797
tests/components/plugwise/fixtures/m_adam_jip/all_data.json (1)
6-6: Consistent control state updates across devices
The control state changes from "off" to "idle" have been applied consistently across multiple devices. This standardization improves the state management consistency.
Also applies to: 39-39, 270-270, 327-327
custom_components/plugwise/climate.py (2)
254-263: LGTM! Improved HVAC action determination logic.
The code has been simplified while maintaining functionality. The direct use of control_state when available is cleaner, and the fallback logic for heating/cooling states is properly preserved.
Line range hint 279-290: Verify input validation after removing the validity check.
The removal of input validation could potentially allow invalid temperature values to be passed through. Please ensure that:
- The API layer handles input validation appropriately
- Invalid values don't cause unexpected behavior
tests/components/plugwise/fixtures/m_adam_multiple_devices_per_zone/all_data.json (1)
35-35: LGTM! Test fixture properly updated.
The test fixture has been correctly updated to support the new control_state functionality:
- Added control_state fields with appropriate values
- Updated item count to reflect the changes
Also applies to: 76-76, 133-133, 288-288, 443-443, 629-629
tests/components/plugwise/snapshots/test_diagnostics.ambr (1)
37-37: LGTM! Test snapshot correctly synchronized.
The test snapshot has been properly updated to match the test fixture changes, maintaining test consistency.
Also applies to: 79-79, 136-136, 292-292, 447-447, 633-633
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
tests/components/plugwise/test_climate.py (3)
37-37: LGTM! Consider adding edge case tests.The added assertions for
hvac_actioncorrectly verify the expected states for both climate entities. The test coverage looks good.Consider adding test cases for edge cases such as:
- Transition states between heating and idle
- Error states or invalid hvac actions
Also applies to: 59-59
Line range hint
116-117: LGTM! Comprehensive state transition testing.The test thoroughly verifies HVAC action transitions between cooling and heating states, with proper assertions at each stage. The mock data setup effectively simulates real-world state changes.
Consider extracting the mock data setup into helper functions to improve test readability:
def setup_heating_state(mock_device): mock_device.devices["da224107914542988a88561b4452b0f6"]["select_regulation_mode"] = "heating" mock_device.devices["f2bf9048bef64cc5b6d5110154e33c81"]["control_state"] = "heating" # ... rest of the heating state setupAlso applies to: 146-147, 177-178
Line range hint
1-478: Excellent test coverage and implementation.The test suite demonstrates:
- Comprehensive coverage of all HVAC actions (heating, cooling, idle, preheating)
- Proper state transition testing
- Good use of pytest parameterization
- Effective mock data management
Consider creating a test constants file to store common test values and states, which would make the tests more maintainable and reduce duplication.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
tests/components/plugwise/test_climate.py(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
tests/components/plugwise/test_climate.py (4)
Line range hint 92-93: LGTM! Good coverage of different HVAC states.
The assertions properly verify distinct HVAC actions ("preheating" and "idle") for different climate entities, providing good coverage of various operational states.
Also applies to: 99-100
Line range hint 324-325: LGTM! Proper verification of heating state.
The assertion correctly verifies the heating state for the Anna climate device.
Line range hint 366-367: LGTM! Good coverage of cooling state.
The assertion properly verifies the cooling state, complementing the heating state test for complete coverage of operational modes.
Line range hint 391-392: LGTM! Complete coverage with idle state testing.
The addition of the idle state assertion completes the test coverage for all possible HVAC actions (heating, cooling, and idle).



Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes for Version 0.55.2
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
These updates aim to improve user experience and device management within the system.