Skip to content

Conversation

@mvaligursky
Copy link

@mvaligursky mvaligursky commented Oct 16, 2025

-C, --lod-chunk-size <N|Nk>       Target splats per LOD chunk (K = ×1024). Default: 512K
-X, --lod-max-extent <units>      Max AABB extent before node split (world units). Default: 16

@mvaligursky mvaligursky self-assigned this Oct 16, 2025
@mvaligursky mvaligursky added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 16, 2025
@mvaligursky mvaligursky requested a review from a team October 16, 2025 14:26
Comment on lines +80 to +81
-C, --lod-chunk-size <N|Nk> Target splats per LOD chunk (K = ×1024). Default: 512K
-X, --lod-max-extent <units> Max AABB extent before node split (world units). Default: 16
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
-C, --lod-chunk-size <N|Nk> Target splats per LOD chunk (K = ×1024). Default: 512K
-X, --lod-max-extent <units> Max AABB extent before node split (world units). Default: 16
-C, --lod-chunk-size <N|Nk> Target splats per LOD chunk (K = ×1024). Default: 512K
-X, --lod-max-extent <units> Max AABB extent before node split (world units). Default: 16

splat-transform input1.ply input2.ply output.ply -t 0,0,10 -s 0.5

# Generate LOD with custom chunk size and node split size
splat-transform input.ply output/lod-meta.json --lod-chunk-gaussians 512K --lod-max-node-size 16
Copy link
Contributor

@willeastcott willeastcott Oct 17, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
splat-transform input.ply output/lod-meta.json --lod-chunk-gaussians 512K --lod-max-node-size 16
splat-transform input.ply output/lod-meta.json --lod-chunk-size 512K --lod-max-extent 16

@slimbuck
Copy link
Member

slimbuck commented Nov 2, 2025

@mvaligursky are you happy to close this one in favour of #94?

@mvaligursky
Copy link
Author

closed as done here: #94

@slimbuck slimbuck closed this Nov 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants