Skip to content

piyaldeb/Capstone

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

40 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

The sonar technology is one of the key elements of underwater exploration and navigation, however, ability to distinguish between stones and mines in problematic ocean environments is still a very challenging issue. This distinction is of utmost importance for submarine safety and, therefore, to prevent any disasters. In this research, we are eager to deal with the problem previously mentioned through the use of data analytics on an all-encompassing sonar dataset. This will involve the investigation of a range of techniques to pick out and examine those aspects that correctly separate rock and mine signatures allowing sonar to be more precise in identifying underwater threats, and so in providing a much greater degree of safety for submarine operations.

Differentiating between a rock and a mine on a sonar graph can be tricky, but some key characteristics can help. Here's what to look for:

Rock Signature:

  • Return Strength: A rock will typically show a strong, sharp return on the sonar graph. This translates to a tall, narrow peak on the graph.
  • Echo Shape: The echo from a rock will usually have a symmetrical shape, meaning the peak rises and falls evenly.
  • Target Size: Depending on the size of the rock, the echo might occupy a small or medium area on the horizontal axis (representing distance from the sonar).

Mine Signature:

  • Return Strength: Mines can also show a strong return, but it might not be as sharp as a rock. The peak on the graph might be broader or have a slight double peak.
  • Echo Shape: The echo from a mine can be less symmetrical than a rock. This is because the mine might have internal structures or cavities that cause the sound wave to bounce back in a more complex way.
  • Target Size: Mines often have a larger footprint on the sonar graph compared to a rock. This is because the sonar might be reflecting off various features within the mine like tunnels, walls, or collapsed areas.

Here's a table summarizing the key differences:

Feature Rock Mine
Return Strength Strong, Sharp Peak Strong, Broader Peak (might have double peak)
Echo Shape Symmetrical Less Symmetrical
Target Size Small to Medium Large

Additional factors to consider:

  • Depth: Rocks and mines can be located at different depths depending on the context.
  • Sonar Settings: The resolution and frequency of the sonar can affect how clearly these features are displayed.

Overall: While interpreting sonar graphs requires experience, these characteristics can give you a good starting point to differentiate between rocks and mines. For a more definitive answer, it's often recommended to combine sonar data with other techniques like visual inspection or underwater surveys.

This is dataset looks like

image

This is the Rocks Reading which is very simple in nature

download

This is the Mine Reading which is very complex and having unorganised spikes

download (1)

Our Predictive Model will predict is it rock or mine image

Meet "The Team"

  • Ranak Debnath
  • Md Mazidul Islam
  • Md Ananur Islam
  • Amrit Kumar Samantray

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published