-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 409
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
support selective block for MPPExchangeWriter #9195
Conversation
Signed-off-by: guo-shaoge <shaoge1994@163.com>
Signed-off-by: guo-shaoge <shaoge1994@163.com>
Signed-off-by: guo-shaoge <shaoge1994@163.com>
size_t rows = 0; | ||
if constexpr (selective_block) | ||
{ | ||
RUNTIME_CHECK(block.info.selective && !block.info.selective->empty()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why need to throw error if selective->empty() is true? Seems this function does not assume input block is not empty
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The next PR will make sure every block.info.selective
is filled with data.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
but I think just check block.info.selective
is enough?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If block.info.selective->empty()
is true, it means it's an empty block.
The code path shouldn't reach here.
Signed-off-by: guo-shaoge <shaoge1994@163.com>
Signed-off-by: guo-shaoge <shaoge1994@163.com>
Signed-off-by: guo-shaoge <shaoge1994@163.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: gengliqi, windtalker The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
[LGTM Timeline notifier]Timeline:
|
/retest |
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: ref #9196
Problem Summary:
What is changed and how it works?
This is part of
auto pass through hashagg
. We need selective block becauseAutoPassThroughBlockInputStream
may output selective block(only subset of rows are effective).IColumn::updateWeakHash32()
,IColumn:scatter()
andIColumn::scatterTo()
FineGrainedWriter
andHashPartitionWriter
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note