test: skip some upgrade tests for next-gen#63331
Conversation
|
/test pull-unit-test-next-gen |
|
@CbcWestwolf: The specified target(s) for
Use DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #63331 +/- ##
================================================
+ Coverage 72.7832% 73.2624% +0.4791%
================================================
Files 1832 1832
Lines 495794 496159 +365
================================================
+ Hits 360855 363498 +2643
+ Misses 113010 110814 -2196
+ Partials 21929 21847 -82
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
/test pull-unit-test-next-gen |
|
@CbcWestwolf: The specified target(s) for
Use DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/test pull-unit-test-next-gen |
|
@CbcWestwolf: The specified target(s) for
Use DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/test pull-unit-test-next-gen |
|
@CbcWestwolf: The specified target(s) for
Use DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/retest |
1 similar comment
|
/retest |
|
@CbcWestwolf: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Co-authored-by: D3Hunter <jujj603@gmail.com>
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func TestIssue17979_1(t *testing.T) { | ||
| if kerneltype.IsNextGen() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is this related to upgrade?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, they call BootstrapSession
There was a problem hiding this comment.
normal bootstrap also call BootstrapSession, i mean does it call the upgrade process?
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func TestIssue17979_2(t *testing.T) { | ||
| if kerneltype.IsNextGen() { |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: D3Hunter, tangenta The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |

What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: ref #61702
Problem Summary:
Since in next-gen cluster all tables that are created by bootstrap can not have non-clustered primary key, we can skip the test cases containing
upgradeToVer248What changed and how does it work?
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.