Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pkg/ddl: fix an issue where endkey usage issues caused index loss #47818

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 20, 2023

Conversation

zimulala
Copy link
Contributor

@zimulala zimulala commented Oct 19, 2023

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #46306

Problem Summary:
Ref: #45679. Before this PR(#45679 ), we used [startKey, endKey] with endInclude as the table range. After this PR we used [startKey, endKey.next).
We do "add index" on a branch without #45679, then get startKey and endKey with the range [startKey, endKey].
Then we do upgrade, we will continue to "add index" in the branch with #45679. And we use [startKey, endKey).

What is changed and how it works?

If the old version upgrades to the new version, we add Next to the endKey.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)

deploy v7.1.1+ cluster
set @@global.tidb_ddl_enable_fast_reorg = 0;
Create a table and import 3.5 million rows.

Do alter table t add index idx(a, b);, and when it backfills 700,000+ indexes, kill the cluster.
Then upgrade this cluster to master.
After upgrading successfully, do admin check index t idx

Result:

  • Before this PR, we will get an error like ERROR 8223 (HY000): data inconsistency in table: t, index: idx, handle: 3572562, index-values:"" != record-values:"handle: 3572562, values: [KindString 131 KindString xxx]"
  • After this PR, we get Query OK.
  • No need to test
    • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added do-not-merge/needs-triage-completed release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 19, 2023
@tiprow
Copy link

tiprow bot commented Oct 19, 2023

Hi @zimulala. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 19, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #47818 (0a25f53) into master (ab4c20b) will increase coverage by 0.9081%.
Report is 39 commits behind head on master.
The diff coverage is 20.0000%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #47818        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   71.8756%   72.7837%   +0.9081%     
================================================
  Files          1396       1422        +26     
  Lines        404969     411710      +6741     
================================================
+ Hits         291074     299658      +8584     
+ Misses        94275      93185      -1090     
+ Partials      19620      18867       -753     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 41.4691% <20.0000%> (?)
unit 71.8479% <20.0000%> (-0.0278%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
dumpling 53.9913% <ø> (ø)
parser ∅ <ø> (∅)
br 48.6737% <ø> (-4.2782%) ⬇️

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added needs-cherry-pick-release-7.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-7.5 branch. and removed do-not-merge/needs-triage-completed labels Oct 20, 2023
@zimulala zimulala changed the title pkg/ddl: test pkg/ddl: fix an issue where endkey usage issues caused index loss Oct 20, 2023
pkg/ddl/reorg.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. approved labels Oct 20, 2023
@zimulala
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test check-dev2

@tiprow
Copy link

tiprow bot commented Oct 20, 2023

@zimulala: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/test check-dev2

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Oct 20, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: tangenta, wjhuang2016

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [tangenta,wjhuang2016]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added lgtm and removed needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. labels Oct 20, 2023
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Oct 20, 2023

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2023-10-20 06:24:48.27126197 +0000 UTC m=+1983885.858372100: ☑️ agreed by tangenta.
  • 2023-10-20 08:30:45.339350338 +0000 UTC m=+1991442.926460468: ☑️ agreed by wjhuang2016.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit f874e3a into pingcap:master Oct 20, 2023
12 of 16 checks passed
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-7.5: #47884.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved lgtm needs-cherry-pick-release-7.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-7.5 branch. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

data inconsistency after upgrade cluster during add index
4 participants