Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

planner: fix bug in PhysicalTableReader::Clone() #45302

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 12, 2023

Conversation

windtalker
Copy link
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #45299

Problem Summary:

What is changed and how it works?

Fix PhysicalTableReader::Clone, so PhysicalTableReader::TablePlans are still extracted from PhysicalTableReader::tablePlan

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

Signed-off-by: xufei <xufeixw@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. do-not-merge/needs-triage-completed do-not-merge/invalid-title size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 11, 2023
@tiprow
Copy link

tiprow bot commented Jul 11, 2023

Hi @windtalker. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@SeaRise
Copy link
Contributor

SeaRise commented Jul 11, 2023

/cc @SeaRise

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot requested a review from SeaRise July 11, 2023 10:15
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added needs-cherry-pick-release-5.3 Type: Need cherry pick to release-5.3 needs-cherry-pick-release-5.4 Should cherry pick this PR to release-5.4 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-6.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-6.1 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-6.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-6.5 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-7.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-7.1 branch. and removed do-not-merge/needs-triage-completed labels Jul 11, 2023
@windtalker windtalker changed the title Fix bug in PhysicalTableReader::Clone() planner: Fix bug in PhysicalTableReader::Clone() Jul 11, 2023
@windtalker windtalker changed the title planner: Fix bug in PhysicalTableReader::Clone() planner: fix bug in PhysicalTableReader::Clone() Jul 11, 2023
return nil, err
}
// TablePlans are actually the flattened plans in tablePlan, so can't copy them, just need to extract from tablePlan
cloned.TablePlans = flattenPushDownPlan(cloned.tablePlan)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does other TableReader like PhysicalIndexReader need to be fixed?

	if cloned.indexPlan, err = p.indexPlan.Clone(); err != nil {
		return nil, err
	}
	if cloned.IndexPlans, err = clonePhysicalPlan(p.IndexPlans); err != nil {
		return nil, err
	}

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I think you are right, and it does not cause a bug because indexPlan is not used during execution time.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. approved labels Jul 11, 2023
@hawkingrei
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the ok-to-test Indicates a PR is ready to be tested. label Jul 11, 2023
@hawkingrei
Copy link
Member

/retest

1 similar comment
@hawkingrei
Copy link
Member

/retest

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added lgtm and removed needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. labels Jul 12, 2023
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jul 12, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: qw4990, SeaRise

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jul 12, 2023

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2023-07-11 11:00:34.113521027 +0000 UTC m=+416125.883859740: ☑️ agreed by qw4990.
  • 2023-07-12 01:41:39.899122714 +0000 UTC m=+468991.669461435: ☑️ agreed by SeaRise.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit bbae44b into pingcap:master Jul 12, 2023
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-5.4: #45307.

ti-chi-bot pushed a commit to ti-chi-bot/tidb that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2023
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-6.1: #45308.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-6.5: #45309.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-7.1: #45310.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-5.3: #45311.

ti-chi-bot pushed a commit to ti-chi-bot/tidb that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2023
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
ti-chi-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2023
ti-chi-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2023
ti-chi-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved lgtm needs-cherry-pick-release-5.3 Type: Need cherry pick to release-5.3 needs-cherry-pick-release-5.4 Should cherry pick this PR to release-5.4 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-6.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-6.1 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-6.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-6.5 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-7.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-7.1 branch. ok-to-test Indicates a PR is ready to be tested. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

parallel apply does not work with mpp
5 participants