Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

lightning: refine write and ingest logic more like producer-consumer #40692

Merged
merged 41 commits into from
Feb 27, 2023

Conversation

lance6716
Copy link
Contributor

@lance6716 lance6716 commented Jan 18, 2023

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #40725

Problem Summary:

What is changed and how it works?

propose regionJob which is dedicated to do data importing on a region. Add worker to handle regionJob and let producer to generate regionJob.

Check List

Tests

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Jan 18, 2023

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • D3Hunter
  • gozssky

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added do-not-merge/needs-linked-issue do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 18, 2023
hawkingrei and others added 7 commits January 18, 2023 15:08
Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
}
}

err := local.writeAndIngestPairs(ctx, job)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not move this logic to the job?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For now I want the job to provide single actions, so we may extend more action like scanRegion in future and the worker can call single action like a state machine

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about abstracting a worker struct and moving all this logic to the worker?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

extend more action like scanRegion in future

can make job a interface, worker can just call job.execute(ctx)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about abstracting a worker struct and moving all this logic to the worker?

What about this? I think a struct like jobWorker is more clear.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@lance6716 lance6716 Feb 27, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That require a lof of work, I prefer we finish this PR timely and leave it for future work.

we can do it when integrate engine/backend with LOAD DATA/DDL.

br/pkg/lightning/backend/local/local.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
br/pkg/lightning/backend/local/local.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
@lance6716
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-integration-br-tests

Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
@lance6716

This comment was marked as outdated.

Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
@lance6716
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-integration-br-tests

Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 23, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@lichunzhu lichunzhu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will review later

br/pkg/lightning/backend/local/region_job.go Show resolved Hide resolved
br/pkg/lightning/backend/local/local.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Feb 27, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@sleepymole sleepymole left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please address existing comments. Almost LGTM.

Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Feb 27, 2023
@sleepymole sleepymole added the component/lightning This issue is related to Lightning of TiDB. label Feb 27, 2023
@sleepymole
Copy link
Contributor

/run-integration-br-test

@lance6716
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 7ceb901

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component/lightning This issue is related to Lightning of TiDB. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

lightning local backend has too many levels to do the real job
6 participants