-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
privilege: fix user change after show grants
and add user existed check for show grants
#19568
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
imtbkcat
added
type/bugfix
This PR fixes a bug.
component/privilege
needs-cherry-pick-3.0
labels
Aug 28, 2020
lysu
reviewed
Aug 28, 2020
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
LGTM |
ti-srebot
approved these changes
Aug 28, 2020
/merge |
ti-srebot
added
the
status/can-merge
Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer.
label
Aug 28, 2020
Your auto merge job has been accepted, waiting for:
|
/run-all-tests |
@imtbkcat merge failed. |
/merge |
/run-all-tests |
@imtbkcat merge failed. |
/merge |
/run-all-tests |
ti-srebot
pushed a commit
to ti-srebot/tidb
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 28, 2020
Signed-off-by: ti-srebot <ti-srebot@pingcap.com>
cherry pick to release-3.0 in PR #19587 |
ti-srebot
pushed a commit
to ti-srebot/tidb
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 28, 2020
Signed-off-by: ti-srebot <ti-srebot@pingcap.com>
cherry pick to release-4.0 in PR #19588 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
component/privilege
sig/execution
SIG execution
status/can-merge
Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer.
status/LGT2
Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
type/bugfix
This PR fixes a bug.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #18878
Problem Summary:
select user()
returns different result after executeshow grants
show grants
can show grants on not existed user.What is changed and how it works?
What's Changed:
auth.UserIdentity
pointer on show grants.showGrants
to avoid executed on not existed user.How it Works:
Because of
SHOW GRANTS
change the content inauth.Identity
, when executeSHOW GRANTS
, it will change the host ofUser
in session variable. The result ofselect user()
will changed.Related changes
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Release note
SHOW GRANTS
can show grants for not existed user.