v6.0.0 release notes: update the description of "setting incorrect values for system variables" #20768
Conversation
…lues for system variables"
Oreoxmt
added
type/bugfix
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @Oreoxmt, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request updates the release notes for TiDB v6.0.0 to clarify the behavior of system variables. Specifically, it changes the description to indicate that TiDB versions 5.4 and earlier allowed incorrect values for some no-op system variables, while versions 6.0.0 and later disallow this behavior. This change aims to provide a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of the system variable handling across different TiDB versions.
Highlights
- Release Notes Update: The release notes for TiDB v6.0.0 have been updated to clarify the behavior of system variables regarding incorrect values.
- Version Specific Behavior: The change highlights that TiDB versions 5.4 and earlier permitted incorrect values for no-op system variables, while v6.0.0 and later versions enforce stricter validation.
Changelog
- releases/release-6.0.0-dmr.md
- Updated the description of system variable behavior to specify that versions 5.4 and earlier allowed incorrect values, while v6.0.0 and later disallow them.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
A variable's plight,
Old values, not always right,
Six point oh clears,
A new era nears,
Strict checks now shine so bright.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
ti-chi-bot
bot
added
the
size/XS
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The pull request updates the description of "setting incorrect values for system variables" in the release notes for v6.0.0. The change clarifies that this behavior applies to v5.4 and earlier versions, rather than v5.4 only. The change seems straightforward and correct.
Merge Readiness
The pull request appears to be ready for merging, as it involves a simple clarification in the release notes and does not introduce any new code or functionality. There are no critical or high severity issues identified. I am unable to directly approve the pull request, and recommend that others review and approve this code before merging.
|
@xhebox: adding LGTM is restricted to approvers and reviewers in OWNERS files. In response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
[LGTM Timeline notifier]Timeline:
|
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Oreoxmt The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
|
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
|
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
|
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
|
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
|
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
|
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
|
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
…lues for system variables"
First-time contributors' checklist
What is changed, added or deleted? (Required)
Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)
Tips for choosing the affected version(s):
By default, CHOOSE MASTER ONLY so your changes will be applied to the next TiDB major or minor releases. If your PR involves a product feature behavior change or a compatibility change, CHOOSE THE AFFECTED RELEASE BRANCH(ES) AND MASTER.
For details, see tips for choosing the affected versions.
What is the related PR or file link(s)?
Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?