Skip to content

zh: add tidb operator overview #2760

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: feature/v2
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

liubog2008
Copy link
Member

@liubog2008 liubog2008 commented May 12, 2025

First-time contributors' checklist

What is changed, added, or deleted? (Required)

Which TiDB Operator version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)

  • master (the latest development version)
  • v2.0 (TiDB Operator 2.0 versions)
  • v1.6 (TiDB Operator 1.6 versions)
  • v1.5 (TiDB Operator 1.5 versions)
  • v1.4 (TiDB Operator 1.4 versions)
  • v1.3 (TiDB Operator 1.3 versions)

What is the related PR or file link(s)?

  • This PR is translated from:
  • Other reference link(s):

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added missing-translation-status This PR does not have translation status info. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 12, 2025
Signed-off-by: liubo02 <liubo02@pingcap.com>
Signed-off-by: liubo02 <liubo02@pingcap.com>
@liubog2008 liubog2008 force-pushed the liubo02/tidb-operator-overview branch from 79f1c89 to f2066b7 Compare May 12, 2025 09:41

## V2 vs V1

由于 TiDB 和 Kubernetes 生态的快速发展,TiDB Operator 发布了不兼容的大版本 V2。V2 和 V1 的具体区别以及可以参考文档 [V2 VS V1](v2-vs-v1.md)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

create an empty doc v2-vs-v1.md to make linter happy?

Signed-off-by: liubo02 <liubo02@pingcap.com>
@Oreoxmt Oreoxmt self-assigned this May 15, 2025
@Oreoxmt Oreoxmt self-requested a review May 15, 2025 08:43
@Oreoxmt Oreoxmt added translation/doing This PR’s assignee is translating this PR. v2.0 This PR/issue applies to TiDB Operator v2.0. labels May 15, 2025
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot removed the missing-translation-status This PR does not have translation status info. label May 15, 2025
Co-authored-by: Aolin <aolinz@outlook.com>
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented May 22, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from oreoxmt. For more information see the Code Review Process.
Please ensure that each of them provides their approval before proceeding.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@Oreoxmt Oreoxmt requested review from fgksgf and Oreoxmt May 22, 2025 06:06
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. label May 26, 2025
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented May 26, 2025

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2025-05-26 07:38:57.513845741 +0000 UTC m=+254667.885633203: ☑️ agreed by Oreoxmt.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 26, 2025
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented May 27, 2025

@fgksgf: adding LGTM is restricted to approvers and reviewers in OWNERS files.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. translation/doing This PR’s assignee is translating this PR. v2.0 This PR/issue applies to TiDB Operator v2.0.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants