Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

json-functions: Update status and links (#10076) #10145

Merged

Conversation

ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This is an automated cherry-pick of #10076

What is changed, added or deleted? (Required)

json-functions: Update status and links

Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)

Tips for choosing the affected version(s):

By default, CHOOSE MASTER ONLY so your changes will be applied to the next TiDB major or minor releases. If your PR involves a product feature behavior change or a compatibility change, CHOOSE THE AFFECTED RELEASE BRANCH(ES) AND MASTER.

For details, see tips for choosing the affected versions (in Chinese).

  • master (the latest development version)
  • v6.2 (TiDB 6.2 versions)
  • v6.1 (TiDB 6.1 versions)
  • v5.4 (TiDB 5.4 versions)
  • v5.3 (TiDB 5.3 versions)
  • v5.2 (TiDB 5.2 versions)
  • v5.1 (TiDB 5.1 versions)
  • v5.0 (TiDB 5.0 versions)

What is the related PR or file link(s)?

Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?

  • Delete files
  • Change aliases
  • Need modification after applied to another branch
  • Might cause conflicts after applied to another branch

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member Author

ti-chi-bot commented Jun 27, 2022

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • TomShawn

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added area/sql-infra Indicates that the Issue or PR belongs to the area of sql-infra and sql-metadata. ONCALL Relates to documentation oncall. require-LGT1 Indicates that the PR requires an LGTM. requires-version-specific-changes After cherry-picked, the cherry-picked PR requires further changes. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. type/cherry-pick-for-release-6.0 This PR is cherry-picked to release-6.0 from a source PR. type/enhancement The issue or PR belongs to an enhancement. labels Jun 27, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot requested a review from TomShawn June 27, 2022 06:29
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Jun 27, 2022
@TomShawn
Copy link
Contributor

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member Author

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: c032336

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Jun 27, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit c94882b into pingcap:release-6.0 Jun 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/sql-infra Indicates that the Issue or PR belongs to the area of sql-infra and sql-metadata. ONCALL Relates to documentation oncall. require-LGT1 Indicates that the PR requires an LGTM. requires-version-specific-changes After cherry-picked, the cherry-picked PR requires further changes. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. type/cherry-pick-for-release-6.0 This PR is cherry-picked to release-6.0 from a source PR. type/enhancement The issue or PR belongs to an enhancement.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants