Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change "client" to "SDK" in README #382

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 9, 2024
Merged

Change "client" to "SDK" in README #382

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 9, 2024

Conversation

jseldess
Copy link
Contributor

@jseldess jseldess commented Aug 8, 2024

Problem

We are inconsistent in how we refer to our client libraries.

Solution

As we mostly refer to our "SDKs" rather than our "clients", we've updated our docs to prefer "SDK". This PR makes equivalent updates to the Python README.

Addresses: https://app.asana.com/0/1206419570114940/1207978475519546/f

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update
  • Infrastructure change (CI configs, etc)
  • Non-code change (docs, etc)
  • None of the above: (explain here)

Test Plan

Describe specific steps for validating this change.

As we mostly refer to our "SDKs" rather than our "clients",
we've updated our docs to prefer "SDK". This PR makes equivalent
updates to the Python README.

Addresses: https://app.asana.com/0/1206419570114940/1207978475519546/f
@jseldess jseldess changed the title Change "client" to "SDK" Change "client" to "SDK" in README Aug 8, 2024
@jhamon jhamon self-requested a review August 9, 2024 15:36
@jhamon jhamon merged commit 7d6e4f0 into main Aug 9, 2024
168 checks passed
@jhamon jhamon deleted the readme-update branch August 9, 2024 15:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants