Skip to content

Conversation

kocsismate
Copy link
Member

Some wither tests are going to fail.. but I'd like to merge #19970 first and then rebase this one instead of fixing the warnings.

Copy link
Member

@TimWolla TimWolla left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No strong opinion either way. I don't think it is necessary to have, though (due to the much clearer naming of with…()).


public function getScheme(): string {}

#[\NoDiscard(message: "as Uri\Rfc3986\Uri::withScheme() does not modify the object itself")]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This message is referring to the wrong class (same below).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants