Fix zend_jit_stop_counter_handlers() performance issues with protect_memory=1#11323
Closed
iluuu1994 wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Fix zend_jit_stop_counter_handlers() performance issues with protect_memory=1#11323iluuu1994 wants to merge 1 commit into
iluuu1994 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…memory=1 The function repeatedly calls mprotect() which is extremely slow. In our community build, the Laravel tests went from ~6 minutes to ~4 hours. This issue only occurs with opcache.protect_memory=1.
dstogov
approved these changes
May 26, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The function repeatedly calls mprotect() which is extremely slow. In our community build, the Laravel tests went from ~6 minutes to ~4 hours. This issue only occurs with opcache.protect_memory=1.
@dstogov Would you like to keep the
zend_shared_alloc_lock/zend_shared_alloc_unlockcalls in its original place? Iterating all functions should be very fast so repeatedly locking/unlocking could be more trouble than worth it. I have not measured this though.