-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 404
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug report on clarity over replicate #15
Comments
Hi Cranavis, Could you please share your replicate prediction link? We could solve this with a higher tile overlapping. |
An exemple :
https://replicate.com/philz1337x/clarity-upscaler?prediction=trwtfbv5qxrgg0cen8tvmn7qs8
add luminosity to check rainbow.
Say me if you need more example.
But this is for each tiled image. (I suppose this is tiles problem)
But each time on large image.
I am a photographer. I'm looking for an enhancer to remaster my photos. For art photography like mine, in the dark, your AI is much better than magnific. Less destructive. And much cheaper on repliacte since I don't upscale. I'm still at scale 1 to remaster. My entire raw photos are in 5000x4000 before going to 20000x140000 with topaz. For certain objects I sometimes have images in 12000x1000.
The problem is not the size of the tiles, but their management.
So, until this is resolved, it is impossible for me to use your software for large images, or large parts of images.
Have nice days.
Yann
De : philz1337x ***@***.***>
À : philz1337x/clarity-upscaler ***@***.***>
Sujet : Re: [philz1337x/clarity-upscaler] Bug report on clarity over replicate (Issue #15)
Date : 05/04/2024 04:52:31 Europe/Paris
Copie à : cranavis ***@***.***>;
Author ***@***.***>
Hi Cranavis,
Could you please share your replicate prediction link?
We could solve this with a higher tile overlapping.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
I can't open your prediction link, you need to click the share button in replicate to create a public link. |
https://replicate.com/p/mypk11y3g9rgp0ces1dtq44ww4
The shared link
Remember to up exposition, to see vertical lines.
Have nice days
yann
De : philz1337x ***@***.***>
À : philz1337x/clarity-upscaler ***@***.***>
Sujet : Re: [philz1337x/clarity-upscaler] Bug report on clarity over replicate (Issue #15)
Date : 09/04/2024 07:27:12 Europe/Paris
Copie à : cranavis ***@***.***>;
Author ***@***.***>
I can't open your prediction link, you need to click the share button in replicate to create a public link.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
here is an other link where we can easly see the seprarton.
https://replicate.com/p/bjd45py429rgj0cev2w98y0kh0
That a pain.
Replica is the only one good i find for photos.
Better than Magnific, better than firefly.
Because using low parameters, no heavy transform, not destructive.
Just this line is destrictive.
I join exemple i did.
Without clarity (1c ; 2c) - with clarity 1d ; 2c)
That is web size. Real size is average 20.000 x 14.000 pixels
I didn't search add details. I search avec perfect result.
Details are not ever good for best result.
Smooth of the 2c is perfect.
Except this line, it's a pleasure to use Clarity.
Have a nice day.
Yann
De : philz1337x ***@***.***>
À : philz1337x/clarity-upscaler ***@***.***>
Sujet : Re: [philz1337x/clarity-upscaler] Bug report on clarity over replicate (Issue #15)
Date : 09/04/2024 07:27:12 Europe/Paris
Copie à : cranavis ***@***.***>;
Author ***@***.***>
I can't open your prediction link, you need to click the share button in replicate to create a public link.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Hi.
Please let us use lora file from local path.
From our computer.
Too many link are not direct link to the file.
Unsable from clarity.
Have nice days.
De : philz1337x ***@***.***>
À : philz1337x/clarity-upscaler ***@***.***>
Sujet : Re: [philz1337x/clarity-upscaler] Bug report on clarity over replicate (Issue #15)
Date : 09/04/2024 07:27:12 Europe/Paris
Copie à : cranavis ***@***.***>;
Author ***@***.***>
I can't open your prediction link, you need to click the share button in replicate to create a public link.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
yes but replicate wants an url while using the api. |
Maybe a 1 hour temporary folder when we can upload file we have in local, and get a direct link tu use it.
De : philz1337x ***@***.***>
À : philz1337x/clarity-upscaler ***@***.***>
Sujet : Re: [philz1337x/clarity-upscaler] Bug report on clarity over replicate (Issue #15)
Date : 22/04/2024 20:12:50 Europe/Paris
Copie à : cranavis ***@***.***>;
Author ***@***.***>
yes but replicate wants an url while using the api.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi.
For clarity on replicate.
When I use a large image, I have rainbow lines at the border of the tiles. Every time.
Easy to reveal by adding a little brightness.
Unusable result.
I noticed this after doing 3 photo edits...
See cut example:
https://ibb.co/ccxFmvQ
Have a nice day.
Cranavis
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: