-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rules failing with schematronProcessingEngine="pure" #47
Comments
Hi Francois, I created a test file and it works without problems. |
I don't think so but I will double-check tomorrow with a fresh test case. Will report - thanks. |
Obviously a classpath issue. It's solved now - the work can begin 👍 |
Reopening because I suspect I have a setup issue again: some more patterns with |
Investigating... could this be linked: https://sourceforge.net/p/saxon/mailman/saxon-help/thread/loom.20130530T132624-669%40post.gmane.org/ (cf. answer)? If I make a dumb test:
I get:
|
|
Super thanks :) |
Saxon 9.7.0_18 HE, class |
Will the next snapshot be enough to test the fix? |
Yes. Just noticed that the Travis build failed - on it. Sorry. |
Oh don't! If that works, I am going to be the happiest man :-) |
SNAPSHOT -17 should (hopefully) do the trick. Hope to make you the happiest man :) |
It seems that the
|
Sometimes I would appreciate if I would start thinking aforehead.... sigh |
SNAPSHOT -18 seals the deal ✌️ ! |
@fviolette, I've updated org.doctales.schematron to use SNAPSHOT 18. |
Excellent - it's a long shot for me to use it, time to fix content issues ;-) |
Hello,
Thanks for this lib!
The following assert/report expressions fail for me with the
pure
schematronProcessingEngine:I haven't tested with schematron or xslt yet as per #45.
Thanks in advance for your support.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: