Use phalcon_is_iterable() macro instead of phalcon_is_iterable_ex() function #960
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
phalcon
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2013
Use phalcon_is_iterable() macro instead of phalcon_is_iterable_ex() function
ghost
deleted the
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The macro was updated to restore the memory frame and the function was modified not to touch memory frames. This allows to use phalcon_is_iterable_ex() function in the kernel code where memory frames are avoided to boost performance.
Now that phalcon_is_iterable_ex() became smaller, it has more chances to be inlined when used in the kernel code.