Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Feature Request: Allow implicit joins to be turned off because they block more complicated queries from being possible #10704

Closed
dschissler opened this issue Jul 22, 2015 · 9 comments
Closed

Feature Request: Allow implicit joins to be turned off because they block more complicated queries from being possible #10704

dschissler opened this issue Jul 22, 2015 · 9 comments

Comments

@dschissler
Copy link
Contributor

Simply:

  'no_implicit_joins_just_right_now_please' => YES

would be nice. It would help to alleviate the immediate pains of bug #10526.
@dschissler

This comment was marked as abuse.

Sign in to view
@andresgutierrez
Copy link
Contributor

@dschissler where is that fragment of code located?

@dschissler

This comment was marked as abuse.

Sign in to view
@dschissler

This comment was marked as abuse.

Sign in to view
@andresgutierrez
Copy link
Contributor

You can better take the global configuration variables approach:

@dschissler

This comment was marked as abuse.

Sign in to view
@dschissler

This comment was marked as abuse.

Sign in to view
@dschissler

This comment was marked as abuse.

Sign in to view
andresgutierrez added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 5, 2015
@andresgutierrez
Merge pull request #10763 from dschissler/2.0.x
0964a8c 
Fix nested SELECT bug #10705, implemented feature #10704 ability to disable implicit joins for query.
@dschissler

This comment was marked as abuse.

Sign in to view
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@andresgutierrez @dschissler