fix: pin feature-ideation.yml reusable workflow to SHA - #113
Conversation
Pins petry-projects/.github/.github/workflows/feature-ideation-reusable.yml from @v1 to SHA ae9709f4466dec60a5733c9e7487f69dcd004e05 (v1) to satisfy the action-pinning compliance policy. Also syncs the file with the latest upstream template: - Adds dry_run workflow_dispatch input - Adds actions: read permission (feed checkpoint support) - Adds sources_file optional comment - Aligns comment formatting Closes #88 Co-authored-by: don-petry <don-petry@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@don-petry — you are the CODEOWNERS for this repository. This PR pins the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Note
Copilot was unable to run its full agentic suite in this review.
Pins the feature-ideation reusable workflow reference to an immutable SHA for compliance, while syncing this workflow file with the latest upstream template.
Changes:
- Pin
petry-projects/.github/.github/workflows/feature-ideation-reusable.ymlfrom@v1to a specific commit SHA. - Add
dry_runworkflow_dispatch input and pass it through to the reusable workflow. - Expand job permissions to include
actions: readand update inline documentation/comments (including optionalsources_fileguidance).
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
|
Auto-rebase failed — merge conflict — this branch has conflicts with Please resolve the conflicts and push: |
|
Auto-rebase failed — merge conflict — this branch has conflicts with dev-lead will attempt to resolve this automatically. If it cannot, a follow-up comment will explain what needs manual attention. To resolve manually instead: |
|
Auto-rebase failed — merge conflict — this branch has conflicts with dev-lead will attempt to resolve this automatically. If it cannot, a follow-up comment will explain what needs manual attention. To resolve manually instead: |
|
Auto-rebase failed — merge conflict — this branch has conflicts with dev-lead will attempt to resolve this automatically. If it cannot, a follow-up comment will explain what needs manual attention. To resolve manually instead: |
|
Auto-rebase failed — merge conflict — this branch has conflicts with dev-lead will attempt to resolve this automatically. If it cannot, a follow-up comment will explain what needs manual attention. To resolve manually instead: |
|
Auto-rebase failed — merge conflict — this branch has conflicts with dev-lead will attempt to resolve this automatically. If it cannot, a follow-up comment will explain what needs manual attention. To resolve manually instead: |
|
@dev-lead - please fix this PR |
|
Auto-rebase failed — merge conflict — this branch has conflicts with dev-lead will attempt to resolve this automatically. If it cannot, a follow-up comment will explain what needs manual attention. To resolve manually instead: |
|
Auto-rebase failed — merge conflict — this branch has conflicts with dev-lead will attempt to resolve this automatically. If it cannot, a follow-up comment will explain what needs manual attention. To resolve manually instead: |
|
Auto-rebase failed — merge conflict — this branch has conflicts with dev-lead will attempt to resolve this automatically. If it cannot, a follow-up comment will explain what needs manual attention. To resolve manually instead: |
|
Auto-rebase failed — merge conflict — this branch has conflicts with dev-lead will attempt to resolve this automatically. If it cannot, a follow-up comment will explain what needs manual attention. To resolve manually instead: |
|
Auto-rebase failed — merge conflict — this branch has conflicts with dev-lead will attempt to resolve this automatically. If it cannot, a follow-up comment will explain what needs manual attention. To resolve manually instead: |
|
Auto-rebase failed — merge conflict — this branch has conflicts with dev-lead will attempt to resolve this automatically. If it cannot, a follow-up comment will explain what needs manual attention. To resolve manually instead: |
|
Auto-rebase failed — merge conflict — this branch has conflicts with dev-lead will attempt to resolve this automatically. If it cannot, a follow-up comment will explain what needs manual attention. To resolve manually instead: |
|
Auto-rebase failed — merge conflict — this branch has conflicts with dev-lead will attempt to resolve this automatically. If it cannot, a follow-up comment will explain what needs manual attention. To resolve manually instead: |
|
Auto-rebase failed — merge conflict — this branch has conflicts with dev-lead will attempt to resolve this automatically. If it cannot, a follow-up comment will explain what needs manual attention. To resolve manually instead: |
Review — fix requested (cycle 3/3)The automated review identified the following issues. Please address each one: Findings to fixAutomated review — NEEDS HUMAN REVIEWRisk: MEDIUM SummaryThe code changes are sound and security-positive: SHA pinning removes a mutable tag reference (supply-chain hardening), the added 'actions: read' permission is minimal and read-only, and the 'dry_run' boolean input is correctly typed with a safe false default. All CI gates pass (CodeQL, SonarQube, CodeRabbit green). The sole blocker is a persistent merge conflict with main that has resisted 15+ automated rebase attempts since 2026-05-19 — the PR cannot be merged in its current state and requires manual conflict resolution before approval can stand. Findings
Reviewed by the PR-review cascade (triage: haiku 4.5 → deep: sonnet 4.6 + duck: o4-mini → audit: opus 4.7). Reply if you need a human review. Additional tasks
The review cascade will automatically re-review after new commits are pushed. |
Superseded by automated re-review at 3b2b404.
|
Closing due to merge conflict that cannot be auto-rebased. Re-implementing from fresh main via dev-lead. |
Pull request was closed
Summary
petry-projects/.github/.github/workflows/feature-ideation-reusable.ymlfrom@v1to its resolved SHAae9709f4466dec60a5733c9e7487f69dcd004e05to satisfy the action-pinning compliance policy.dry_runworkflow_dispatch input,actions: readpermission, andsources_fileoptional comment.Closes #88
Generated with Claude Code