docs: refresh org READMEs (automated)

[don-petry]

Automated README refresh

Regenerated the org meta-repo README(s) in petry-projects/.github-private from live org state
(repository list, standards docs, agent profiles, and installed frameworks).

Generated by the weekly readme-refresh workflow in petry-projects/.github-private.
Review the diff — curated prose is preserved; only missing/stale facts are corrected.

Action needed: these repos have empty GitHub descriptions — set them on the repo page so future refreshes can enrich the table: TalkTerm, markets

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@don-petry, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 42 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: cd98826a-4687-4b62-969e-74a3ffeaedb1

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 427c2c3 and c5cbc55.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• README.md
• profile/README.md

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch chore/readme-refresh

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[donpetry-bot]

Advisory bots were rate-limited; auto-approval is withheld until they recover. pr-review-sweep will re-review this PR after 2026-07-16T18:07:35Z.

[don-petry]

Dev-Lead — fix-bot-comment (no-changes)

Agent reasoning

Issues addressed: 0
- Rate limit notifications (informational only, no actionable code issues identified)
Files changed: None required
Skipped (informational): 2
```
No code changes are needed. The bot comments are service notifications about usage/review limits, not specific code findings. The PR is ready for review/merge pending completion of the in-progress CI checks.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Refreshes the org meta-repo READMEs in petry-projects/.github-private to reflect current org tooling and automation, including clearer separation between @-mention Copilot agents and GitHub Actions–driven automation.

Changes:

• Updates top-level repo README messaging to emphasize automated workflows/frameworks and rename the agents section to “@-Mention Agents”.
• Consolidates PR review automation details into the “Automated Workflows” table entry and updates standards subtopic summaries.
• Expands the org profile README’s agent and workflow descriptions and adds explicit @<agent-name> invocation guidance.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File	Description
README.md	Refreshes repository overview and the automation/agents sections; updates workflow/standards tables.
profile/README.md	Updates org profile documentation for agent invocation and workflow descriptions.

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request updates documentation in README.md and profile/README.md to clarify the distinction between '@-Mention Agents' and 'Automated Workflows,' while providing more detailed descriptions for specific agents and workflows. A review comment suggests improving the readability of the pr-review-trigger.yml table entry by using a line break to better format the long description.

[don-petry]

Dev-Lead — fix-reviews (applied)

Changes committed and pushed.

[don-petry]

Dev-Lead — review-changes (applied)

Changes committed and pushed.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[don-petry]

Dev-Lead — review-changes (no-changes)

No changes were needed for this PR.

[donpetry-bot]

Automated review — APPROVED ✓

Risk: LOW
Reviewed commit: c5cbc5535128d392f1efe263dbf5bff531c3b508
Review mode: triage-approved (single reviewer)

Summary

Automated docs-only README refresh (README.md, profile/README.md) regenerated from live org state. Renames sections for clarity (Agents → @-Mention Agents, Agentic Workflows → Automated Workflows), consolidates the PR Review Automation section into the workflow table, expands agent descriptions, and cross-links the @PR-Reviewer agent with pr-review-trigger.yml. No code, workflow, or script changes.

Linked issue analysis

No linked issues. This PR is generated by the weekly readme-refresh workflow; no issue linkage expected.

Findings

• Docs-only change: 2 markdown files, +16/-27 lines. No executable content touched.
• Prior bot review threads (2) are both resolved: Copilot flagged an inaccurate "hourly" claim about pr-review-trigger.yml (removed in dev-lead follow-up commits d633619/c5cbc55), and Gemini raised a low-priority table-cell readability nit (addressed/resolved).
• Content spot-check: new prose is consistent with the repo (agents/, prompts/, scripts/, frameworks/, .github/workflows/ all exist; section renames are accurate).
• Secret-scanning MCP tool not available in this run; gitleaks CI secret scan passed and the diff contains no secret-like content.
• Triage-approved confirmation: triage assessment (low risk) is correct; nothing missed.

CI status

All required checks green at c5cbc55: Lint, ShellCheck, Agent Security Scan, Compile agentic workflows, Secret scan (gitleaks), CodeQL (actions/python), SonarCloud Quality Gate passed, AgentShield, unit-tests, holdout-guard, Test-Deletion Guard, CodeRabbit. Skipped jobs are conditional ecosystem audits (npm/pnpm/cargo/pip/govulncheck) and dependabot-automerge — expected for a docs-only PR.

---

Reviewed automatically by the PR-review agent (single-reviewer mode: fable 5). Reply if you need a human review.