Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove links to ohloh, annocpan and cpanratings #21

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
20 changes: 0 additions & 20 deletions ODBC.pm
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2577,20 +2577,6 @@ schema required and the versions of software you are using.
If you are unsure whether you have found a bug report it anyway or
post it to the dbi-users mailing list.

=item pod comments and corrections

If you find inaccuracies in the DBD::ODBC pod or have a comment which
you think should be added then go to L<http://annocpan.org> and submit
them there. I get an email for every comment added and will review
each one and apply any changes to the documentation.
Comment on lines -2580 to -2585
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perhaps this should be edited to provide different instructions for the described feedback (github issues, maybe?), rather than simply deleted, leaving no path for that feedback?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought about re-writing stating that feedback for POD can be provided via Github. But the github repo is already linked from the module metadata and various other places.

annocpan came from a time where there was no github and collaboration was much more difficult, svn.perl.org n- where this module was hosted previously - was 'read only' for everybody except the author and you had to have a 'commit bit' for pushing and pull requests did not exists, they were diff files.

Of course it might still be desirable to have explicit text soliciting feedback for the POD; and that could definitely added, or the original paragraph can be re-phrased, or whatever. The PR was just for 1. pointing out that the links were invalid, 2. adding a one-click way to remove those invalid links.


=item Review DBD::ODBC

Add your review of DBD::ODBC on L<http://cpanratings.perl.org>.

If you are a member on ohloh then add your review or register your
use of DBD::ODBC at L<http://www.ohloh.net/projects/perl_dbd_odbc>.

=item submit test cases

Most DBDs are built against a single client library for the database.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2654,12 +2640,6 @@ Level 2
These are in need of sorting and annotating. Some are relevant only
to ODBC developers.

You can find DBD::ODBC on ohloh now at:

L<http://www.ohloh.net/projects/perl_dbd_odbc>

If you use ohloh and DBD::ODBC please say you use it and rate it.

There is a good search engine for the various Perl DBI lists at the
following URLS:

Expand Down