Skip to content

Enable maintenance banner#1341

Closed
Zishan-7 wants to merge 2 commits intopeanut-walletfrom
feat/enable-maintainence-banner
Closed

Enable maintenance banner#1341
Zishan-7 wants to merge 2 commits intopeanut-walletfrom
feat/enable-maintainence-banner

Conversation

@Zishan-7
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 20, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
peanut-wallet Error Error Oct 20, 2025 8:50am

💡 Enable Vercel Agent with $100 free credit for automated AI reviews

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 20, 2025

Walkthrough

Two config flags in underMaintenanceConfig were enabled (enableFullMaintenance, enableMaintenanceBanner), and a Listbox value binding was adjusted to allow undefined in Select component rendering.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Configuration flag enablement
src/config/underMaintenance.config.ts
Flipped enableFullMaintenance and enableMaintenanceBanner from false to true.
Select component minor binding fix
src/components/Global/Select/index.tsx
Adjusted Listbox value binding to pass value or undefined to handle null/undefined without type/conflict issues.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • kushagrasarathe
  • jjramirezn
  • Hugo0

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title Check ✅ Passed The title "Enable maintenance banner" directly references a real and significant change in the pull request—the enableMaintenanceBanner configuration flag being set to true in underMaintenance.config.ts. However, the changeset also includes enabling full maintenance mode (enableFullMaintenance set to true) in the same configuration file, plus an unrelated change to the Select component's Listbox value binding. The title accurately captures one key aspect of the primary change but does not encompass the full scope of the modifications.
Description Check ✅ Passed No pull request description was provided by the author. The description field is empty and contains no information about the changeset. However, according to the evaluation criteria, this is an exceptionally lenient check designed to pass as long as the description is not completely off-topic. An empty description, while lacking detail, is not off-topic in nature and therefore meets the minimum threshold for this particular check.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat/enable-maintainence-banner

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 20, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between df9d3aa and 7fe581b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/config/underMaintenance.config.ts (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Deploy-Preview

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/components/Global/Select/index.tsx (1)

47-47: Consider using nullish coalescing for more precise null handling.

The change correctly converts null to undefined for Listbox compatibility. However, using the nullish coalescing operator (??) instead of logical OR (||) would be more semantically precise and clearer in intent.

Apply this diff:

-            <Listbox value={value || undefined} onChange={onChange}>
+            <Listbox value={value ?? undefined} onChange={onChange}>

Alternatively, consider updating the type definition to explicitly accept undefined:

-    value: SelectItem | null
+    value: SelectItem | null | undefined
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7fe581b and 0ffc115.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/components/Global/Select/index.tsx (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Deploy-Preview

@Zishan-7
Copy link
Contributor Author

Not needed anymore

@Zishan-7 Zishan-7 closed this Oct 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant