Add support for HTTPS RR #33
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
Author
|
There is really only 1 commit here. I'm not sure why those other ones are included in the PR. |
Contributor
|
Maybe you can rebase your tree? (force push will be needed) |
Contributor
Author
|
I closed this one and tried again on a fresh branch. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-01.html
I manually tested dnslib/client.py compatibility with dig 9.16.22-Debian. There are some differences in quoting behavior. The spec allows quoted and unquoted parameter strings and dig uses quotes when quotes aren't needed to handle whitespace.