Fix view tool

[CTY-git]

PR Checklist

• The commit message follows our guidelines: Code of conduct
• Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
• Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
• Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
• Include PR in release notes?

PR Type

• Bugfix
• Feature
• Refactoring
• Build /CI
• Documentation
• Others

What is the current behavior?

Original view command is prone to bugs and errors

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Changed view to use pathlib.Path instead and just use iterdir method to get contents of a directory.
Output now demarcates directories and files.

Other information

[patched-admin]

The pull request review highlights potential unintended changes in directory traversal behavior due to the removal of a depth limitation in the __view method, possibly leading to bugs if recursive directory traversal was anticipated. Nevertheless, switching from os.walk() to iterdir() may reduce security risks linked to deep traversal without introducing new vulnerabilities. On coding standards, while refactoring into conditional expressions improves readability, overuse in complex list operations may hinder clarity, and the newly structured output format with separators may require documentation if altering the standard output paradigm. The attached diff only reflects a version change from '0.0.82' to '0.0.83' with no visible code modifications, implying the requirement for attention to ensure this version increment aligns with any undocumented changes in terms of functionality and security considerations. Additional context or documentation for the version update would aid in understanding the underlying enhancements or fixes warranting this increment.

---

• File changed: patchwork/common/tools/code_edit_tools.py
  1. Potential Bugs:
  • The __view method previously used os.walk() to traverse directories recursively up to 2 levels deep, which is a depth limitation that is now removed in the current implementation. This change in behavior might be unintended and considered a bug if the previous recursive behavior was expected.

2. Security Vulnerabilities:

   • The change from recursive directory listing to using iterdir() limits exposure to fields within the immediate directory, which may mitigate certain risks associated with deep traversal. However, there are no apparent new security vulnerabilities introduced by the iterdir() method itself.

3. Code Standards:

   • The code inside the nested loops has been refactored into conditional expressions, enhancing readability. However, using inline conditional expressions (a if b else c) in list operations may slightly reduce readability if overused. Consider using a more explicit approach for clarity in complex operations.
   • The addition of separators like 'Directories: \n' and 'Files: \n' provides clarity in output, aligning results with human-readable format despite deviating from the previously plain list format. Such changes might need proper documentation if they form part of a standard output paradigm.

• File changed: pyproject.toml
  The diff provided indicates a version increment in the 'pyproject.toml' file from '0.0.82' to '0.0.83'. There is no additional code or configuration changes visible in the diff, thus indicating that this change is only related to the versioning metadata.

• Potential Bugs: No code changes present, so no evaluation of bugs can be made.
• Security Vulnerabilities: As this diff only includes metadata changes, it doesn't directly introduce security vulnerabilities. However, it would be prudent to ensure that the update to the version number aligns with any underlying code changes that were made to warrant the new version, ensuring those changes were secure.
• Coding Standards: This change adheres to standard versioning practices; however, it lacks any additional context or description, which would typically accompany a version update to explain the reason behind this increment. Ensure the version update is documented appropriately elsewhere, detailing any changes or improvements included in this new version.

Without further context on code changes, there's limited scope for in-depth analysis here. Please ensure the relevant changes corresponding to this version bump are documented and reviewed separately if they exist outside this diff.