Skip to content

Conversation

@CTY-git
Copy link
Contributor

@CTY-git CTY-git commented Dec 5, 2024

PR Checklist

  • The commit message follows our guidelines: Code of conduct
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
  • Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
  • Include PR in release notes?

PR Type

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Refactoring
  • Build /CI
  • Documentation
  • Others

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Other information

@CTY-git CTY-git requested a review from jonahdc December 5, 2024 07:52
@patched-admin
Copy link
Contributor

The pull request review discusses a code modification that addresses a logical error in path comparison by ensuring that both the resolved absolute path and the resolved repository path are consistently compared, thus preventing potential bugs related to incorrect path traversal. This change enhances security by closing a loophole that could allow unauthorized file access through path traversal attacks. It aligns with coding standards that advocate for the use of absolute paths to maintain security and correctness in path operations, with the change being straightforward and adhering to sensible coding practices without deviating from project standards. Additionally, the review notes a metadata update where the version number is incremented from 0.0.79 to 0.0.80. While this version bump does not directly introduce bugs or vulnerabilities, it signals a new release, necessitating attention to version-related dependencies and documentation updates in the project.


  • File changed: patchwork/common/tools/code_edit_tools.py
    The code modification here is changing the check to ensure the resolved absolute path is relative to the resolved repository path, potentially fixing a logical error in path comparison.
  1. Potential Bugs: This ensures that path comparisons are accurate since both sides of the condition are resolved consistently. Without this change, the code might incorrectly allow illegal path traversal if self.repo_path is not resolved.

  2. Security Vulnerabilities: The modification improves security by closing a potential avenue for path traversal attacks. Ensuring both paths are resolved before comparison helps prevent unauthorized file access.

  3. Coding Standards: The change adheres to typical coding standards that prefer the use of absolute paths for security and correctness in path operations. The logic is straightforward and clear, thus it aligns with sensible coding practices. There's no significant deviation from standard practices in the project (as far as can be seen from this snippet).

  • File changed: pyproject.toml
    The modification shown in the diff is updating the version number from 0.0.79 to 0.0.80. Since this change is modifying metadata and not executable code, potential bugs or security vulnerabilities are not directly introduced by this change alone. However, it is important to ensure that any version-related dependencies and compatibility considerations are properly addressed elsewhere in the code, as this change signals a new release. The change adheres to standard version bump practices and does not violate original coding standards. Make sure to update any associated documentation to reflect the new version number if necessary.

@CTY-git CTY-git merged commit b778445 into main Dec 5, 2024
5 checks passed
@CTY-git CTY-git deleted the fix-path-resolution branch December 5, 2024 08:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants