wasm-override: Support checking spec_name
#10380
Conversation
This adds support to the wasm-override feature to compare the spec_name. If the spec_name doesn't match, a warning will be printed and the override will be ignored.
bkchr
added
A0-please_review
bkchr
added
the
D3-trivial 🧸
| #[derive(Clone, Debug, PartialEq)] | ||
| /// The interval in that we will print a warning when a wasm blob `spec_name` | ||
| /// doesn't match with the on-chain `spec_name`. | ||
| const WARN_INTERVAL: Duration = Duration::from_secs(30); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
wouldn't it be much easier if we just abort the command if this didn't match? I would continuously print a warning if at least the wasm-override was applied, and now you want to warn the user. If it was not even applied, I would either exit, or warn once about it and move on.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
it would spare you most of the Arc/Mutex layers as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
wouldn't it be much easier if we just abort the command if this didn't match?
Which command?
I mean the best would be to do that at startup, but there we don't know the spec name and that is also legal to change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Printing just one warning, will probably not bring that much, as it can be overseen relative easily.
This adds support to the wasm-override feature to compare the spec_name. If the spec_name doesn't match, a warning will be printed and the override will be ignored.
This adds support to the wasm-override feature to compare the spec_name. If the spec_name doesn't match, a warning will be printed and the override will be ignored.
This adds support to the wasm-override feature to compare the spec_name. If the spec_name doesn't
match, a warning will be printed and the override will be ignored.
Closes: #9685