Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/pfloat #87

Closed
wants to merge 11 commits into from
Closed

Feature/pfloat #87

wants to merge 11 commits into from

Conversation

tcew
Copy link
Contributor

@tcew tcew commented Jan 12, 2023

This PR adds support for mixed precision preconditioning. Specifically all preconditioning is performed with precision specified by the define for pfloat in includes/types.h . Thus we can set dfloat=double (all outer Krylov iterations will be in double) with pfloat=float (all preconditioning operations performed in single precision.

@tcew tcew changed the base branch from main to staging January 12, 2023 16:21
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 12, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #87 (c2d55bf) into staging (8b11d67) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 80.18%.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           staging      #87    +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage    86.21%   86.22%            
=========================================
  Files          285      285            
  Lines        19760    20129   +369     
=========================================
+ Hits         17037    17357   +320     
- Misses        2723     2772    +49     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
include/linAlg.hpp 100.00% <ø> (ø)
include/mesh.hpp 93.78% <ø> (ø)
include/ogs.hpp 75.00% <ø> (ø)
include/operator.hpp 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
include/parAlmond.hpp 100.00% <ø> (ø)
include/parAlmond/parAlmondAMGLevel.hpp 100.00% <ø> (ø)
include/parAlmond/parAlmondAMGSetup.hpp 100.00% <ø> (ø)
include/parAlmond/parAlmondCoarseSolver.hpp 87.50% <ø> (ø)
include/parAlmond/parAlmondparCSR.hpp 100.00% <ø> (ø)
include/solver.hpp 3.84% <0.00%> (-0.33%) ⬇️
... and 67 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@noelchalmers noelchalmers self-requested a review January 12, 2023 17:06
@tcew tcew closed this Jan 13, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant