Skip to content

possible reuse of logic (simple lexing) #570

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Jul 24, 2016
Merged

possible reuse of logic (simple lexing) #570

merged 15 commits into from
Jul 24, 2016

Conversation

bounceme
Copy link
Collaborator

experimental

bounceme added 6 commits July 22, 2016 07:31
@bounceme
possible reuse of logic
1ef55aa
@bounceme
Update javascript.vim
0caab0e 
functions can have names
@bounceme
Update javascript.vim
ab124b8
@bounceme
Update javascript.vim
0bdec41
@bounceme
in another dilemma
8acc2d3 
this works very well and doesn't rely on syntax at all, however performance is slightly worse
@bounceme
fixed the caching
5926cc0 
performance is back!
@bounceme bounceme changed the title possible reuse of logic possible reuse of logic (simple lexing) Jul 22, 2016
@bounceme
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I think this is ready, though if anyone can test some more that'd be great

@bounceme
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bounceme commented Jul 23, 2016 •
edited
Loading

do people like the behavior of
set indentkeys+=*<return>?

@bounceme
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Ready!

@bounceme
Copy link
Collaborator Author

no issues in my testing, I hope others have similar results

@bounceme bounceme merged commit ab5d96b into develop Jul 24, 2016
@bounceme bounceme deleted the in-block-scope branch July 24, 2016 05:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@bounceme