Skip to content

DOC: Add scaling to large datasets section #28577

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Oct 1, 2019
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
Next Next commit
update
  • Loading branch information
TomAugspurger committed Sep 23, 2019
commit a4baa41ec41a3c279bf88b7a677f6fb339a8d1f6
128 changes: 85 additions & 43 deletions doc/source/user_guide/scale.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -4,10 +4,10 @@
Scaling to large datasets
*************************

Pandas provide data structures for in-memory analytics. This makes using pandas
Pandas provide data structures for in-memory analytics, which makes using pandas
to analyze larger than memory datasets somewhat tricky.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This document is not only for "larger than memory" data right? It becomes already tricky if your dataset is (some factor) smaller than your memory, right? (because we create copies, because reading can take more memory, ...)

At least the first sections in this document equally apply as performance considerations on smaller-than-memory datasets

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tried to clarify this a bit (in part by removing the "use efficient file formats" section.


This document provides a few recommendations for scaling to larger datasets.
This document provides a few recommendations for scaling your analysis to larger datasets.
It's a complement to :ref:`enhancingperf`, which focuses on speeding up analysis
for datasets that fit in memory.

Expand All @@ -20,7 +20,11 @@ Assuming you want or need the expressivity and power of pandas, let's carry on.

import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from pandas.util.testing import make_timeseries

.. ipython:: python
:suppress:

from pandas.util.testing import _make_timeseries


Use more efficient file formats
Expand All @@ -33,58 +37,78 @@ usage, letting you load larger datasets into pandas before running out of
memory.

.. ipython:: python
:suppress:

# Make a random in-memory dataset
ts = make_timeseries(freq="30S", seed=0)
ts


We'll now write and read the file using CSV and parquet.


.. ipython:: python

%time ts.to_csv("timeseries.csv")
ts = _make_timeseries(freq="30S", seed=0)
ts.to_csv("timeseries.csv")
ts.to_parquet("timeseries.parquet")

For example, suppose we have a dataset like the following::

id name x y
timestamp
2000-01-01 00:00:00 1029 Michael 0.278837 0.247932
2000-01-01 00:00:30 1010 Patricia 0.077144 0.490260
2000-01-01 00:01:00 1001 Victor 0.214525 0.258635
2000-01-01 00:01:30 1018 Alice -0.646866 0.822104
2000-01-01 00:02:00 991 Dan 0.902389 0.466665
... ... ... ... ...
2000-12-30 23:58:00 992 Sarah 0.721155 0.944118
2000-12-30 23:58:30 1007 Ursula 0.409277 0.133227
2000-12-30 23:59:00 1009 Hannah -0.452802 0.184318
2000-12-30 23:59:30 978 Kevin -0.904728 -0.179146
2000-12-31 00:00:00 973 Ingrid -0.370763 -0.794667

That dataset has been stored on disk as CSV and Parquet. We want to
compare the performance of reading those two formats.

.. ipython:: python

col = "timestamp"
%time pd.read_csv("timeseries.csv", index_col=col, parse_dates=[col])

.. ipython:: python

%time ts.to_parquet("timeseries.parquet")

.. ipython:: python

%time _ = pd.read_parquet("timeseries.parquet")

Notice that parquet gives much higher performance for reading and writing, both
Notice that parquet gives higher performance for reading (and writing), both
in terms of speed and lower peak memory usage. See :ref:`io` for more.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe link to the section in io.rst that compares the performance of different formats?


Load less data
--------------

Suppose our raw dataset on disk has many columns, but we need just a subset
for our analysis. To get those columns, we can either

1. Load the entire dataset then select those columns.
2. Just load the columns we need.

Loading just the columns you need can be much faster and requires less memory.

.. ipython:: python
:suppress:

# make a similar dataset with many columns
timeseries = [
make_timeseries(freq="1T", seed=i).rename(columns=lambda x: f"{x}_{i}")
_make_timeseries(freq="1T", seed=i).rename(columns=lambda x: f"{x}_{i}")
for i in range(10)
]
ts_wide = pd.concat(timeseries, axis=1)
ts_wide.head()
ts_wide.to_parquet("timeseries_wide.parquet")

Suppose our raw dataset on disk has many columns::

id_0 name_0 x_0 y_0 id_1 name_1 x_1 ... name_8 x_8 y_8 id_9 name_9 x_9 y_9
timestamp ...
2000-01-01 00:00:00 1015 Michael -0.399453 0.095427 994 Frank -0.176842 ... Dan -0.315310 0.713892 1025 Victor -0.135779 0.346801
2000-01-01 00:01:00 969 Patricia 0.650773 -0.874275 1003 Laura 0.459153 ... Ursula 0.913244 -0.630308 1047 Wendy -0.886285 0.035852
2000-01-01 00:02:00 1016 Victor -0.721465 -0.584710 1046 Michael 0.524994 ... Ray -0.656593 0.692568 1064 Yvonne 0.070426 0.432047
2000-01-01 00:03:00 939 Alice -0.746004 -0.908008 996 Ingrid -0.414523 ... Jerry -0.958994 0.608210 978 Wendy 0.855949 -0.648988
2000-01-01 00:04:00 1017 Dan 0.919451 -0.803504 1048 Jerry -0.569235 ... Frank -0.577022 -0.409088 994 Bob -0.270132 0.335176
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
2000-12-30 23:56:00 999 Tim 0.162578 0.512817 973 Kevin -0.403352 ... Tim -0.380415 0.008097 1041 Charlie 0.191477 -0.599519
2000-12-30 23:57:00 970 Laura -0.433586 -0.600289 958 Oliver -0.966577 ... Zelda 0.971274 0.402032 1038 Ursula 0.574016 -0.930992
2000-12-30 23:58:00 1065 Edith 0.232211 -0.454540 971 Tim 0.158484 ... Alice -0.222079 -0.919274 1022 Dan 0.031345 -0.657755
2000-12-30 23:59:00 1019 Ingrid 0.322208 -0.615974 981 Hannah 0.607517 ... Sarah -0.424440 -0.117274 990 George -0.375530 0.563312
2000-12-31 00:00:00 937 Ursula -0.906523 0.943178 1018 Alice -0.564513 ... Jerry 0.236837 0.807650 985 Oliver 0.777642 0.783392

[525601 rows x 40 columns]


To load the columns we want, we have two options.
Option 1 loads in all the data and then filters to what we need.

.. ipython:: python
Expand All @@ -94,16 +118,15 @@ Option 1 loads in all the data and then filters to what we need.
%time _ = pd.read_parquet("timeseries_wide.parquet")[columns]

Option 2 only loads the columns we request. This is faster and has a lower peak
memory usage, since the entire dataset isn't in memory at once.
memory usage since the entire dataset isn't in memory at once.

.. ipython:: python

%time _ = pd.read_parquet("timeseries_wide.parquet", columns=columns)


With :func:`pandas.read_csv`, you can specify ``usecols`` to limit the columns
read into memory.

read into memory. Not all file formats that can be read by pandas provide an option
to read a subset of columns.

Use efficient datatypes
-----------------------
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -173,10 +196,11 @@ fits in memory, you can work with datasets that are much larger than memory.
coordination between chunks. For more complicated workflows, you're better off
:ref:`using another library <scale.other_libraries>`.

Let's make a larger dataset on disk (as parquet files) that's split into chunks,
one per year.
Suppose we have an even larger "logical dataset" on disk that's a directory of parquet
files. Each file in the directory represents a different year of the entire dataset.

.. ipython:: python
:suppress:

import pathlib

Expand All @@ -187,20 +211,36 @@ one per year.
pathlib.Path("data/timeseries").mkdir(exist_ok=True)

for i, (start, end) in enumerate(zip(starts, ends)):
ts = make_timeseries(start=start, end=end, freq='1T', seed=i)
ts.to_parquet(f"data/timeseries/ts-{i}.parquet")

files = list(pathlib.Path("data/timeseries/").glob("ts*.parquet"))
files
ts = _make_timeseries(start=start, end=end, freq='1T', seed=i)
ts.to_parquet(f"data/timeseries/ts-{i:0>2d}.parquet")


::

data
└── timeseries
├── ts-00.parquet
├── ts-01.parquet
├── ts-02.parquet
├── ts-03.parquet
├── ts-04.parquet
├── ts-05.parquet
├── ts-06.parquet
├── ts-07.parquet
├── ts-08.parquet
├── ts-09.parquet
├── ts-10.parquet
└── ts-11.parquet

Now we'll implement an out-of-core ``value_counts``. The peak memory usage of this
workflow is the single largest chunk, plus a small series storing the unique value
counts up to this point.

counts up to this point. As long as each individual file fits in memory, this will
work for arbitrary-sized datasets.

.. ipython:: python

%%time
files = list(pathlib.Path("data/timeseries/").glob("ts*.parquet"))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think necessary to encapsulate this in list

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, that's a leftover from before, when I printed out files. But that's covered by the tree output earlier on now that we aren't showing make_timeseries.

counts = pd.Series(dtype=int)
for path in files:
# Only one dataframe is in memory at a time...
Expand All @@ -210,14 +250,16 @@ counts up to this point.
counts.astype(int)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this necessary? Just seems like some cruft in here for dtype preservation. Ideally would like to keep code here at a minimum

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Without it, you get a float:

In [16]: s = pd.Series(dtype=int)

In [17]: s.add(t, fill_value=0)
Out[17]:
0    1.0
1    2.0
dtype: float64

I think it'd be strange for a value_counts to return floating-point values in the counts.


Some readers, like :meth:`pandas.read_csv` offer parameters to control the
``chunksize``. Manually chunking is an OK option for workflows that don't
``chunksize`` when reading a single file.

Manually chunking is an OK option for workflows that don't
require too sophisticated of operations. Some operations, like ``groupby``, are
much harder to do chunkwise. In these cases, you may be better switching to a
different library that implements these out-of-core algorithms for you.

.. _scale.other_libraries:

Use Other libraries
Use other libraries
-------------------

Pandas is just one library offering a DataFrame API. Because of its popularity,
Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions pandas/util/testing.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1682,7 +1682,7 @@ def makeMultiIndex(k=10, names=None, **kwargs):
]


def make_timeseries(start="2000-01-01", end="2000-12-31", freq="1D", seed=None):
def _make_timeseries(start="2000-01-01", end="2000-12-31", freq="1D", seed=None):
"""
Make a DataFrame with a DatetimeIndex

Expand All @@ -1703,7 +1703,7 @@ def make_timeseries(start="2000-01-01", end="2000-12-31", freq="1D", seed=None):

Examples
--------
>>> make_timeseries()
>>> _make_timeseries()
id name x y
timestamp
2000-01-01 982 Frank 0.031261 0.986727
Expand Down