-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TST: confirming tests for some fixed issues #14117
TST: confirming tests for some fixed issues #14117
Conversation
Current coverage is 85.27% (diff: 100%)@@ master #14117 diff @@
==========================================
Files 139 139
Lines 50543 50543
Methods 0 0
Messages 0 0
Branches 0 0
==========================================
+ Hits 43101 43102 +1
+ Misses 7442 7441 -1
Partials 0 0
|
7eb016f
to
4b246ef
Compare
@@ -1788,3 +1788,11 @@ def test_value_counts_categorical_not_ordered(self): | |||
index=exp_idx, name='xxx') | |||
tm.assert_series_equal(s.value_counts(normalize=True), exp) | |||
tm.assert_series_equal(idx.value_counts(normalize=True), exp) | |||
|
|||
def test_nat_operations(self): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not the right place for this. maybe in tseries/tests_timeseries
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yep, I was not sure where to put this. Finding a place to put a test it a good way to get lost :-)
but note that it is not a timeseries (in the sense of a series having a datetime index), so it would also be strange to put it in tseries/test_timeseries
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, I see that TestTimeSeries
mixes tests for both cases (dt index or dt values), so will put it there.
(although I would find it more logical to separate those)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hmm, ok then.
@jorisvandenbossche #6817 is not the right issue. can you update. (at the top of the PR) |
4b246ef
to
252facb
Compare
@jreback whoops, updated (the commit message contained the correct number) |
closes #7710, closes #8617, closes #13119
Closes a few issues still tagged with 0.19.0 that only need a confirming test