Feature request: specify chunksize for read_sql

[davidstackio]

It would be helpful to iterate through rows returned from an sql query (sqlite specifically) chunk by chunk just as is done in the read_csv and text files function as described here: http://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/io.html#iterating-through-files-chunk-by-chunk

The return value should be an iterable object. This will prevent queries from returning too large an amount of data, (possibly) exceeding the system memory.

[davidstackio]

The exact error I got was this on pandas version 0.10.1:

  runData = psql.read_frame("SELECT * FROM output", conn)
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\pandas\io\sql.py", line 151, in read_frame
    coerce_float=coerce_float)
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\pandas\core\frame.py", line 1014, in from_records
    coerce_float=coerce_float)
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\pandas\core\frame.py", line 5468, in _to_arrays
    if len(data) == 0:
TypeError: object of type 'NoneType' has no len()

The TypeError is a little confusing as it took me awhile to figure out it was happening because I was hitting the memory limit. Maybe just a clearer error message would be enough (max query sized reached or something), perhaps suggesting that the user use the SQL LIMIT command to prevent this problem (See http://php.about.com/od/mysqlcommands/g/Limit_sql.htm)

[davidstackio]

I just ran:

runData = psql.read_frame("SELECT * FROM output LIMIT 10", conn)

with no problem

[jreback]

so this would need (to be consistent) iterator and chunksize keywords

[lebedov]

For the time being, here is a simple implementation of the requested functionality: https://gist.github.com/lebedov/6831387

[jreback]

@jorisvandenbossche @hayd this needs to go on the new sql issues list?

[jorisvandenbossche]

Hmm, I preferably keep the list in #6292 as the important todo's that should ideally be finished before releasing it. And this is a nice feature request, but not a blocker for the basic functionality. Just keep it as a seperate issue?

[jreback]

ok....how about you create another issue (mark as 0.15), then will include items that are not in #6292
but are marked as SQL; that way easy to move an issue out of current release to next one (and track all the SQL ones). make check boxes and such.

#3745, #5008, #2754 I think should go on one of these as well (or if already satisifed by another issue go ahead and close)

[hayd]

This came up again here: http://stackoverflow.com/q/25633830/1240268

[mariusbutuc]

I take full responsibility for asking how to pull large amounts of data from a remote server, into a DataFrame, that @hayd just referenced and answered in such good detail on SO ––for which I thank you!

I've updated the SO question with more context, but if I can help / contribute in any way here, I'd be more than happy to.