fix(ast): skip source_text and comments fields in ContentEq for Program

[overlookmotel]

source_text is not semantically meaningful, and comments is mostly not either. Exclude both from ContentEq comparison for Program.

[overlookmotel]

• fix(ast): skip source_text and comments fields in ContentEq for Program #14370 👈 (View in Graphite)
• main

---

How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

• 0-merge - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
• hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR excludes the source_text and comments fields from semantic content comparison in the Program struct by adding #[content_eq(skip)] attributes. The change ensures that ContentEq comparisons focus on semantically meaningful AST content rather than incidental metadata like source text and comments.

• Added #[content_eq(skip)] attributes to exclude non-semantic fields from equality comparison
• Applied to both source_text and comments fields in the Program struct

---

_{Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.}

[overlookmotel]

Not sure who should review this. I've assigned to myself. If no-one has comments within a day or two, I'll merge it.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #14370 will not alter performance

_{Comparing 10-06-fix_ast_skip_source_text_and_comments_fields_in_contenteq_for_program_ (a86ca0b) with main (4bf6f69)¹}

Summary

✅ 37 untouched

Footnotes

1. No successful run was found on main (a86ca0b) during the generation of this report, so 4bf6f69 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

[overlookmotel]

Merge activity

• Oct 6, 5:41 PM UTC: The merge label '0-merge' was detected. This PR will be added to the Graphite merge queue once it meets the requirements.
• Oct 6, 5:41 PM UTC: overlookmotel added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
• Oct 6, 5:47 PM UTC: Merged by the Graphite merge queue.