[unit-tests-only] move typescript tests to unit folder

[individual-it]

Description

move tests to unit test folder, following the pattern set by #5224 and finally decided by #5425

fixes #5471

after this PR all spec files should be in the right place:

find -name *spec.* | grep -v node_modules
./packages/web-pkg/tests/unit/utils/encodePath.spec.ts
./packages/web-pkg/tests/unit/utils/objectKeys.spec.ts
./packages/web-pkg/tests/unit/observer/visibility.spec.ts
./packages/web-pkg/tests/unit/cache/cache.spec.ts
./packages/web-pkg/tests/unit/http/client.spec.ts
./packages/web-app-files/tests/unit/views/Favorites.spec.js
./packages/web-app-files/tests/unit/mixins.spec.js
./packages/web-app-files/tests/unit/mixins/collaborators.spec.js
./packages/web-app-files/tests/unit/services/client.spec.ts
./packages/web-app-files/tests/unit/services/cache.spec.ts
./packages/web-app-files/tests/unit/store/mutations.spec.js
./packages/web-app-files/tests/unit/store/getters.spec.js
./packages/web-app-files/tests/unit/helpers/path.spec.js
./packages/web-app-files/tests/unit/helpers/user/avatarUrl.spec.ts
./packages/web-app-files/tests/unit/helpers/share/triggerShareAction.spec.js
./packages/web-app-files/tests/unit/helpers/resource/asset.spec.ts
./packages/web-app-files/tests/unit/helpers/resource/common.spec.ts
./packages/web-app-files/tests/unit/helpers/resource/privatePreviewBlob.spec.ts
./packages/web-app-files/tests/unit/helpers/resource/publicPreviewUrl.spec.ts
./packages/web-app-files/tests/unit/components/AppBar/SelectedResources/BatchActions.spec.js
./packages/web-app-files/tests/unit/components/AppBar/AppBar.spec.js
./packages/web-app-files/tests/unit/components/AppBar/Upload/FileUpload.spec.js
./packages/web-app-files/tests/unit/components/SideBar/Shares/Collaborators/ShowCollaborator.spec.js
./packages/web-app-files/tests/unit/components/SideBar/Shares/Collaborators/AutocompleteItem.spec.js
./packages/web-app-files/tests/unit/components/SideBar/Details/FileDetails.spec.js
./packages/web-app-files/tests/integration/specs/pagination.spec.js
./packages/web-runtime/tests/unit/mixins/lifecycleMixin.spec.js
./packages/web-runtime/tests/unit/mixins/focusMixin.spec.js
./packages/web-runtime/tests/unit/store/config.spec.js
./packages/web-runtime/tests/unit/helpers/config.spec.js
./packages/web-runtime/tests/unit/helpers/resource.spec.js
./packages/web-runtime/tests/unit/helpers/theme.spec.js
./packages/web-runtime/tests/unit/components/Notification.spec.js
./packages/web-runtime/tests/unit/components/UserMenu.spec.js
./packages/web-runtime/tests/unit/components/__snapshots__/TopBar.spec.js.snap
./packages/web-runtime/tests/unit/components/SidebarQuota.spec.js
./packages/web-runtime/tests/unit/components/TopBar.spec.js

Motivation and Context

fixing sonar cloud coverage report

Types of changes

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• Technical debt
• Tests

Checklist:

• Code changes
• Unit tests added
• Acceptance tests added
• Documentation ticket raised:

Open tasks:

• ...

[individual-it]

according to a talk in the chat it's not fully decided yet if there's a dedicated tests folder or tests should live side-by-side with their respective files
feel free to comment in this PR or to refuse it, we can also adjust the sonarcloud config to ignore *spec* files in the count of the coverage

[pascalwengerter]

@fschade @kulmann we need a decision on where to store test files since currently it's not standardized. @LukasHirt made a great argument here, I'm undecided but we should align it once and stick to it :)

[individual-it]

the discussion was opened by @fschade here #5425 please give you input

[individual-it]

I've updated the original comment, please review again

[sonarqubecloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
No Duplication information

[kulmann]

👍