-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 199
feat: allow scaling of the search service #11029
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
jvillafanez
wants to merge
5
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
search_scaling
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f59fd7c
feat: allow scaling of the search service
jvillafanez 7c9e7e1
feat: refactor scaling code also for tests
jvillafanez 087d4a4
docs: adjust description of the config option
jvillafanez 6df657b
refactor: use a closeFn in the GetIndex instead of checking value
jvillafanez e0f069f
fix: adjust unit tests
jvillafanez File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I missed one word 😅
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure... with the new wording, it seems other processes might be able to access the index as long as they aren't requesting exclusive access.
To clarify, oCIS' search service will request exclusive access (write mode), which will cause other processes to be locked out regardless of the access type.
Also, with the
Scale
flag active, the difference is that oCIS will connect and disconnect with different accesses (including exclusive access) multiple times. Exclusive access will be requested (depending on the operation), and it will be granted if possible, but the connection won't last long, so other connections will be able to access the index afterwards.