-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
Adds support to multiple ranges in ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById (#2110) #2114
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
CHANGES
Outdated
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ | |||
v3.0.4 - YYYY-MMM-DD (to be released) | |||
------------------------------------- | |||
|
|||
- Adds support to multiple ranges in ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById | |||
[Issue #2110 - @theMiddleBlue, @zimmerle] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@j0k2r why you did put my name on it and where is yours? :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, sorry I don't know the ModSecurity CHANGES rules, I took the the issue "participants"
Is this PR covering the use of multiple comma-separated IDs too? (-> If it does, then adding a test case for that use would be helpful. |
No, it only parse the Id range |
@dune73, After doing some tests, it seems that neither I'm not a Lexer expert but apparently with the https://github.com/SpiderLabs/ModSecurity/blob/cbd15ec1382f7e2c3e19a93ea9ca3e8b4ced44f6/src/parser/seclang-scanner.ll#L447 ruleRemoveBy does not support (,) Don't know if I'm right. |
Thank you for checking. Much appreciated. So many subtle shortcomings with v3... |
No description provided.