-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 179
Foxy images #395
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Foxy images #395
Conversation
@mikaelarguedas @ruffsl friendly ping. All Noetic packages up to I think Foxy's release date is June 5th. I'm not exactly sure what that means for this PR. It takes me a little while to study this repo when coming back to it. Anything needed from me for these Docker images? |
Yea, I was about to comment to suggest splitting this PR into two given the time between the distro releases. That way we could merge as soon as the first is ready. The docker library admins may not see our upstream PR until Monday though. |
ae52858
to
f6e4ee0
Compare
Noetic is now its own standalone PR #405 Needs some tweaks to the snippets before resulting in building Dockerfiles, more details on the PR. This PR has been updated to be Foxy only. It requires noetic to be released first and does not provide images for arm32 as it seems that it may not get foxy binaries. |
Signed-off-by: Mikael Arguedas <mikael.arguedas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mikael Arguedas <mikael.arguedas@gmail.com>
f6e4ee0
to
fffa5c4
Compare
@mikaelarguedas , looks like the generated files are now building from the release repo, see latest push onto PR. Are there any other blockers? |
Nope this was just waiting for a sync and an announcement ! |
Opening for visibility, this is on hold until the beta releases of Noetic and Foxy are out. From there we'll need to generate the dockerfiles associated to this manifest change
Note: this point the
ros:latest
tag to Foxy according to #286. Documentation will need to be updated accordinglyEdit: Noetic images have been released in a separate PR #405