Skip to content

Foxy images #395

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 5, 2020
Merged

Foxy images #395

merged 4 commits into from
Jun 5, 2020

Conversation

mikaelarguedas
Copy link
Contributor

@mikaelarguedas mikaelarguedas commented Apr 2, 2020

Opening for visibility, this is on hold until the beta releases of Noetic and Foxy are out. From there we'll need to generate the dockerfiles associated to this manifest change

Note: this point the ros:latest tag to Foxy according to #286. Documentation will need to be updated accordingly

Edit: Noetic images have been released in a separate PR #405

@sloretz
Copy link
Contributor

sloretz commented May 22, 2020

@mikaelarguedas @ruffsl friendly ping. All Noetic packages up to ros-noetic-desktop-full are in the testing repo for amd64 as well as all packages up to ros-noetic-desktop for arm64 (Focal and Buster) + armhf (Focal only). I'll sync to main tomorrow morning PDT before announcing Noetic's release at noon-ish.

I think Foxy's release date is June 5th.

I'm not exactly sure what that means for this PR. It takes me a little while to study this repo when coming back to it. Anything needed from me for these Docker images?

@ruffsl
Copy link
Member

ruffsl commented May 23, 2020

Yea, I was about to comment to suggest splitting this PR into two given the time between the distro releases. That way we could merge as soon as the first is ready. The docker library admins may not see our upstream PR until Monday though.

@mikaelarguedas
Copy link
Contributor Author

Noetic is now its own standalone PR #405

Needs some tweaks to the snippets before resulting in building Dockerfiles, more details on the PR.

This PR has been updated to be Foxy only. It requires noetic to be released first and does not provide images for arm32 as it seems that it may not get foxy binaries.

Signed-off-by: Mikael Arguedas <mikael.arguedas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mikael Arguedas <mikael.arguedas@gmail.com>
@mikaelarguedas mikaelarguedas changed the title Noetic and Foxy images Foxy images May 27, 2020
@ruffsl
Copy link
Member

ruffsl commented Jun 5, 2020

@mikaelarguedas , looks like the generated files are now building from the release repo, see latest push onto PR. Are there any other blockers?

@mikaelarguedas mikaelarguedas marked this pull request as ready for review June 5, 2020 21:46
@mikaelarguedas mikaelarguedas merged commit 245d21b into osrf:master Jun 5, 2020
@mikaelarguedas
Copy link
Contributor Author

Nope this was just waiting for a sync and an announcement !

@mikaelarguedas mikaelarguedas deleted the noetic-foxy branch June 5, 2020 21:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants