Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update exterior_algebra #4093

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 9, 2024

Conversation

lgoettgens
Copy link
Member

See the commit messages for more details to the changes.
This does not change anything large, just unifies and cleans up a bit.

- unify functions for coefficient field and ring (while still using singular in the former case)
- use `@varnames_interface`
- re-structure tests
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 16, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 95.65217% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 84.69%. Comparing base (0b52e65) to head (e74b92e).
Report is 71 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
experimental/ExteriorAlgebra/test/runtests.jl 92.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4093      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.69%   84.69%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         614      614              
  Lines       83568    83568              
==========================================
- Hits        70780    70776       -4     
- Misses      12788    12792       +4     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...xperimental/ExteriorAlgebra/src/ExteriorAlgebra.jl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/Rings/PBWAlgebraQuo.jl 85.84% <100.00%> (ø)
experimental/ExteriorAlgebra/test/runtests.jl 90.90% <92.00%> (-5.87%) ⬇️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

@lgoettgens
Copy link
Member Author

Can we merge this in the meantime, even though the implementation in #4097 seems superior? This PR contains some small improvements that @HechtiDerLachs could then use in the user-facing constructors in #4097 as well

@afkafkafk13
Copy link
Collaborator

Could we decide on @lgoettgens question (merge or leave it out) at triage?

@fingolfin
Copy link
Member

@HechtiDerLachs is fine with this, no complaints in triage

@fingolfin fingolfin merged commit 7769ffa into oscar-system:master Oct 9, 2024
28 checks passed
@lgoettgens lgoettgens deleted the lg/exterior_algebra branch October 9, 2024 09:43
@lgoettgens lgoettgens removed the triage label Oct 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants