Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Distributed version of Key/Value Server [moved] #17

Closed
lvca opened this issue Dec 10, 2012 · 1 comment
Closed

Distributed version of Key/Value Server [moved] #17

lvca opened this issue Dec 10, 2012 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@lvca
Copy link
Member

lvca commented Dec 10, 2012

This is Issue 17 moved from a Google Code project.
Added by 2010-04-12T09:13:30.000Z by l.garu...@gmail.com.
Please review that bug for more context and additional comments, but update this bug.
Closed (Fixed).

Original labels: Type-Enhancement, Priority-High, kv

Original description

The evaluation of the distribution technique has started. Until now the
choice is to use the [http://www.hazelcast.com Hazelcast library]. It's
open source with the same license of Orient (Apache 2). Furthermore has the
same Orient philosophy: no dependencies with 3rd party libs.

Hazelcast provides an already made distributed concurrent HashMap with the
interface MapLoader & MapStore to delegates the load/store of the map to an
external class.

The integration should be straightforward since it should enought to create
an implementation of these 2 interfaces that works with OrientDB, plus the
MigrationListener. MigrationListener is called when new nodes attach to the
cluster or when someone dies. Orient should remove all the entries on
moving data.
@lvca
Copy link
Member Author

lvca commented Apr 24, 2013

Already implemented using Hazelcast

@lvca lvca closed this as completed Apr 24, 2013
@ghost ghost assigned lvca Apr 24, 2013
lvca added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 15, 2015
wolf4ood added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 16, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant