Skip to content

Release notes for 3.0.0-alpha release. #226

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 10, 2018

Conversation

mikeproeng37
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 10, 2018

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 690

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 89.199%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 685: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 2494
Relevant Lines: 2796

💛 - Coveralls

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 689

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 89.199%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 685: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 2494
Relevant Lines: 2796

💛 - Coveralls

* Built-in datafile version compatibility checks so that SDKs will not initialize with a newer datafile it is not compatible with. ([#209](https://github.com/optimizely/java-sdk/pull/209))

### Breaking Changes
* Previously, notification listeners filtered non-string attribute values from the data passed to registered listeners. To support our growing list of supported attribute values, we’ve changed this behavior. Notification listeners will now post any value type passed as an attribute. Therefore, the interface of the notification listeners has changed to accept a `Map<String, ?>`.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we add comment for this? #208
update to 1.7.

Copy link
Contributor

@thomaszurkan-optimizely thomaszurkan-optimizely left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mikeproeng37 mikeproeng37 merged commit 61f6aad into master Oct 10, 2018
@mikeproeng37 mikeproeng37 deleted the mng/prepare-3.0.0-alpha-release branch January 15, 2019 22:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants