-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 565
Bug 2081483: Emit csv_succeeded metrics on startup #2768
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 2081483: Emit csv_succeeded metrics on startup #2768
Conversation
Problem: The getMetricsFromPod function assumes that metrics are exposed on port 8080. This function fails to retrieve metrics from the olm or catalog operator when the port is changed. Solution: Name the port in each of the deployments and update the getMetricsFromPod function to infer the port number from the deployments. Signed-off-by: Alexander Greene <greene.al1991@gmail.com>
@anik120: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Signed-off-by: Josef Karasek <jkarasek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: akihikokuroda <akihikokuroda2020@gmail.com>
1d3acd1
to
5cf1d5b
Compare
/test unit |
@anik120: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2081483, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/bugzilla refresh |
@anik120: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2081483, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@openshift-ci[bot]: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: jianzhangbjz. Note that only operator-framework members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/label cherry-pick-approved
|
@bandrade: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@bandrade: Can not set label cherry-pick-approved: Must be member in one of these teams: [openshift-patch-managers] In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/label cherry-pick-approved |
@jianzhangbjz: Can not set label cherry-pick-approved: Must be member in one of these teams: [openshift-patch-managers] In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/bugzilla-refresh |
Manually adding the CPA label after QE ack in #2768 (comment). |
/bugzilla refresh |
@timflannagan: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2081483, which is valid. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (bandrade@redhat.com), skipping review request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/lgtm |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: anik120, dinhxuanvu, kevinrizza The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/backport-risk-assessed |
Manually adding the backport-risk-assessed label after Per's ACK in #2768 (comment). It looks like that command needs to be prefixed with |
@anik120: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 2081483 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Description of the change:
Backport of openshift/operator-framework-olm#288
Motivation for the change:
Reviewer Checklist
/doc
[FLAKE]
are truly flaky[FLAKE]
tag are no longer flaky