test: add search UI e2e test

[zzcr]

PR

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

• The commit message follows our Commit Message Guidelines
• Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
• Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

• Bugfix
• Feature
• Code style update (formatting, local variables)
• Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
• Build related changes
• CI related changes
• Documentation content changes
• Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• No

Other information

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Introduced a comprehensive test suite for the search component, validating its UI across various states including default, clearable, disabled, and different search types.

• Tests

  • Added multiple test cases to ensure visual consistency and functionality of the search feature through automated Playwright testing.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new test suite in tests/search/xdesign.spec.ts that validates the UI components of a search feature using Playwright. The suite includes tests for various states of the search component, such as default, clearable, disabled, and different search types, ensuring visual consistency and functionality through automated screenshots and user interaction simulations.

Changes

File	Change Summary
tests/search/xdesign.spec.ts	Added a test suite for the search component with tests for default, clearable, disabled states, and search types.

Possibly related PRs

• test(autocomplete): add autocomplete UI e2e test #27: The autocomplete UI test suite shares a similar structure and testing framework (Playwright) with the main PR, focusing on validating various UI states, including default, clearable, and disabled states.
• test(tag): add tag e2e UI snapshot #28: The tag component test suite also utilizes Playwright for UI testing and includes tests for different states, paralleling the approach taken in the main PR for the search component.
• test(pager): add pager UI E2E test case #29: The pager UI test suite employs Playwright and covers multiple states and interactions, similar to the comprehensive testing strategy used in the main PR for the search component.
• test(notify): add notify UI e2e test #30: The notify component test suite, like the main PR, uses Playwright to validate UI behavior across different scenarios, ensuring visual consistency and functionality.
• test(alert): add alert e2e ui snapshot #31: The alert component test suite follows the same testing methodology with Playwright, focusing on various UI states and interactions, akin to the main PR's approach.
• test(form): add form UI E2E test case #32: The form component test suite also employs Playwright for UI testing, validating multiple states and functionalities, which aligns with the testing objectives of the main PR.

Suggested reviewers

• zzcr

🐰 In the meadow where the bunnies play,
New tests hop in to brighten the day.
With every click and every glance,
The search component takes a chance.
A clearable, disabled view,
Ensures our UI is tried and true! 🌼

---

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c061386 and e4bef05.

Files selected for processing (1)

• tests/search/xdesign.spec.ts (1 hunks)

Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• tests/search/xdesign.spec.ts

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)

tests/search/xdesign.spec.ts (6)

1-1: Ensure consistent import style.

Consider using a consistent import style throughout the codebase. If the project follows a specific convention for importing dependencies, such as using named imports or importing from specific paths, make sure to adhere to that convention.

---

5-5: Consider moving the pageerror event listener outside the test cases.

Since the pageerror event listener is used in multiple test cases, consider moving it to a beforeEach hook or a separate utility function. This will reduce code duplication and improve maintainability.

---

11-14: Consider adding assertions for specific hover state changes.

In addition to capturing a screenshot of the hover state, consider adding assertions to verify specific changes that occur when hovering over the search input button. For example, you could assert that certain CSS classes are applied or that specific elements become visible.

---

16-19: Consider adding assertions for specific active state changes.

Similar to the hover state, consider adding assertions to verify specific changes that occur when the search input is focused. For example, you could assert that certain CSS classes are applied or that specific elements become visible.

---

27-27: Consider using a more meaningful search term.

Instead of using '111' as the search term, consider using a more realistic and meaningful value that aligns with the expected usage of the search component. This will make the test case more representative of real-world scenarios.

---

46-52: Consider adding more granular assertions for different search types.

The current test case captures a screenshot of the search component with different search types. Consider adding more specific assertions to verify that each search type is rendered correctly. For example, you could assert the presence of specific CSS classes or the visibility of certain elements for each search type.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between eff32a3 and c061386.

Files ignored due to path filters (7)

• tests/search/xdesign.spec.ts-snapshots/active-chromium-win32.png is excluded by !**/*.png
• tests/search/xdesign.spec.ts-snapshots/basic-usage-chromium-win32.png is excluded by !**/*.png
• tests/search/xdesign.spec.ts-snapshots/clearable-chromium-win32.png is excluded by !**/*.png
• tests/search/xdesign.spec.ts-snapshots/disabled-chromium-win32.png is excluded by !**/*.png
• tests/search/xdesign.spec.ts-snapshots/hover-chromium-win32.png is excluded by !**/*.png
• tests/search/xdesign.spec.ts-snapshots/search-types-chromium-win32.png is excluded by !**/*.png
• tests/search/xdesign.spec.ts-snapshots/slot-chromium-win32.png is excluded by !**/*.png

Files selected for processing (1)

• tests/search/xdesign.spec.ts (1 hunks)

Additional comments not posted (2)

tests/search/xdesign.spec.ts (2)

3-53: Great test coverage for the search component!

The test suite covers various important aspects of the search component, including:

• Default UI state
• Hover and active states
• Clearable functionality
• Disabled state
• Different search types

The tests ensure visual consistency by capturing screenshots and comparing them against reference images. This helps catch any unintended visual changes.

The use of page.on('pageerror', ...) is a good practice to detect and fail tests if there are any JavaScript errors on the page.

Overall, this test suite enhances the reliability and maintainability of the search component.

---

9-9: Verify the correctness of the screenshot file name.

Make sure that the screenshot file name 'basic-usage.png' matches the naming convention used in the project and accurately represents the state being captured.