fix：the second level panel style of attributes #903
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/theme/base/src/page/base-config-page.less (1)
254-254: Consider alternative to doubled class selector.The doubled class selector (
.fixed-left.fixed-left) is used to increase specificity, but this is generally considered a code smell. Consider using a more semantic class name or restructuring the CSS to avoid specificity wars.Alternative approaches:
-&.fixed-left.fixed-left { +&.fixed-left-panel {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/theme/base/src/page/base-config-page.less(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/theme/base/src/page/base-config-page.less (2)
257-257: Confirm the 4px height adjustment.
The height calculation has been adjusted from calc(100% - 36px) to calc(100% - 40px), increasing the space reduction by 4px. This change should align with the base panel heights defined in the root variables (e.g., --base-top-panel-height: 40px).
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for the base panel height variable to verify this change.
Let me try searching with a different pattern to find CSS variable definitions.
Let me check the base theme files for the panel height variable.
Height adjustment is correct and consistent with base panel height
The change from calc(100% - 36px) to calc(100% - 40px) is verified to be correct as it now matches the defined CSS variable --base-top-panel-height: 40px in the base theme. This alignment ensures consistent panel heights across the application.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for related height calculations that might need similar adjustments
rg "calc\(100% -" --type css
Length of output: 2059
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for base panel height variable definitions
rg --type css "base-top-panel-height|panel-height" -A 2
Length of output: 57
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for CSS variable definitions in the theme package
fd . packages/theme -e less -e css --exec rg -l "^\s*--" {}
Length of output: 1554
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check base theme files for panel height variables
cat packages/theme/base/src/base.less packages/theme/base/src/common.less packages/theme/base/src/page/base-config-page.less | rg -A 2 "panel|height"
Length of output: 1420
255-255: Verify the removal of 24px offset.
The top position no longer includes the 24px offset (calc(24px + var(--base-nav-panel-width)) → var(--base-nav-panel-width)). Please verify this doesn't cause alignment issues with other UI elements.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the content of the found file to understand if there are any related spacing dependencies.
Let me check the specific file where the change was made to understand the context better.
Let me check if there are any other elements positioned relative to the nav panel to understand potential alignment dependencies.
Based on the analysis of the code, I can now provide the final response:
The removal of 24px offset appears to be intentional and safe.
The --base-nav-panel-width variable is used consistently throughout the file, and the element's positioning aligns with the navigation panel's width (40px). The removal of the 24px offset seems to be a deliberate design change as:
- No other elements in the codebase rely on this specific 24px + nav panel spacing combination
- The element is properly constrained with other calculations for width and height
- The
!importantflag ensures the intended positioning
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other elements that might depend on this 24px spacing
rg -l "24px" --type css
Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the file for 24px usage context
rg "24px" mockServer/src/assets/css/0.1.20/index.css -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 12838
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content around the modified line
rg "top.*base-nav-panel-width" packages/theme/base/src/page/base-config-page.less -B 3 -A 3
Length of output: 285
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other usages of base-nav-panel-width variable
rg "base-nav-panel-width" packages/theme/base/src/page/base-config-page.less -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 766
English | 简体中文
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Background and solution
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
.fixed-leftclass, improving layout and vertical space allocation.topandheightproperties for better alignment and responsiveness based on new variable definitions.