You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Reporter: RM87 [Submitted to the original trac issue database at 9.01am, Tuesday, 16th August 2011]
Rendering tourism=zoo as half transparent "overlay" (like nature reserves are rendered currently) would be better.
Currently landuse and nature areas are drawn over zoo area and in places where the entire zoo area is covered with landuse/natural areas there is no way to say that this area is a zoo area.
Reporter: RM87
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 9.01am, Tuesday, 16th August 2011]
Rendering tourism=zoo as half transparent "overlay" (like nature reserves are rendered currently) would be better.
Currently landuse and nature areas are drawn over zoo area and in places where the entire zoo area is covered with landuse/natural areas there is no way to say that this area is a zoo area.
Example (not jet covered fully with landuse tags but the area covered with forest shows the problem): http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=59.42285&lon=24.66418&zoom=15&layers=M
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: