Add flashing_lights field #449
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Good suggestion! I would only request one small change: given that the current usage is very small (less than 0.5% of crossings use the tag), I think it would be better to add this one as an optional field ( |
Yeah, this makes sense |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds a field for
flashing_lightswhich will be used for Unmarked/Marked Crossing presets. The keyflashing_lightscurrently has around 2.5K uses. I've added values listed on the wiki article (no,yes,button,always,sensor, andbutton;sensor). Crossings with flashing lights are pretty common in the US, here's an example from Alexandria, VA: