Skip to content

Conversation

@hongkailiu
Copy link
Member

See the failing job [1]:

: [Monitor:legacy-cvo-invariants][bz-OLM] clusteroperator/olm should not change condition/Available expand_less	2h10m52s
{  2 unexpected clusteroperator state transitions during e2e test run.  These did not match any known exceptions, so they cause this test-case to fail:

Nov 21 02:13:21.844 E clusteroperator/olm condition/Available reason/CatalogdDeploymentCatalogdControllerManager_Deploying::OperatorcontrollerDeploymentOperatorControllerControllerManager_Deploying status/False CatalogdDeploymentCatalogdControllerManagerAvailable: Waiting for Deployment\nOperatorcontrollerDeploymentOperatorControllerControllerManagerAvailable: Waiting for Deployment
Nov 21 02:13:21.844 - 20s   E clusteroperator/olm condition/Available reason/CatalogdDeploymentCatalogdControllerManager_Deploying::OperatorcontrollerDeploymentOperatorControllerControllerManager_Deploying status/False CatalogdDeploymentCatalogdControllerManagerAvailable: Waiting for Deployment\nOperatorcontrollerDeploymentOperatorControllerControllerManagerAvailable: Waiting for Deployment

4 unwelcome but acceptable clusteroperator state transitions during e2e test run.  These should not happen, but because they are tied to exceptions, the fact that they did happen is not sufficient to cause this test-case to fail:

Nov 21 01:53:57.961 E clusteroperator/olm condition/Available reason/OperatorcontrollerDeploymentOperatorControllerControllerManager_Deploying status/False OperatorcontrollerDeploymentOperatorControllerControllerManagerAvailable: Waiting for Deployment (exception: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-62517)
Nov 21 01:53:57.961 - 189s  E clusteroperator/olm condition/Available reason/OperatorcontrollerDeploymentOperatorControllerControllerManager_Deploying status/False OperatorcontrollerDeploymentOperatorControllerControllerManagerAvailable: Waiting for Deployment (exception: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-62517)
Nov 21 01:57:07.563 W clusteroperator/olm condition/Available reason/AsExpected status/True CatalogdDeploymentCatalogdControllerManagerAvailable: Deployment is available\nOperatorcontrollerDeploymentOperatorControllerControllerManagerAvailable: Deployment is available (exception: Available=True is the happy case)
Nov 21 02:13:42.162 W clusteroperator/olm condition/Available reason/AsExpected status/True CatalogdDeploymentCatalogdControllerManagerAvailable: Deployment is available\nOperatorcontrollerDeploymentOperatorControllerControllerManagerAvailable: Deployment is available (exception: Available=True is the happy case)
}

[1]. https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.21-e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade/1991653721427152896

See the failing job [1]:

```
: [Monitor:legacy-cvo-invariants][bz-OLM] clusteroperator/olm should not change condition/Available expand_less	2h10m52s
{  2 unexpected clusteroperator state transitions during e2e test run.  These did not match any known exceptions, so they cause this test-case to fail:

Nov 21 02:13:21.844 E clusteroperator/olm condition/Available reason/CatalogdDeploymentCatalogdControllerManager_Deploying::OperatorcontrollerDeploymentOperatorControllerControllerManager_Deploying status/False CatalogdDeploymentCatalogdControllerManagerAvailable: Waiting for Deployment\nOperatorcontrollerDeploymentOperatorControllerControllerManagerAvailable: Waiting for Deployment
Nov 21 02:13:21.844 - 20s   E clusteroperator/olm condition/Available reason/CatalogdDeploymentCatalogdControllerManager_Deploying::OperatorcontrollerDeploymentOperatorControllerControllerManager_Deploying status/False CatalogdDeploymentCatalogdControllerManagerAvailable: Waiting for Deployment\nOperatorcontrollerDeploymentOperatorControllerControllerManagerAvailable: Waiting for Deployment

4 unwelcome but acceptable clusteroperator state transitions during e2e test run.  These should not happen, but because they are tied to exceptions, the fact that they did happen is not sufficient to cause this test-case to fail:

Nov 21 01:53:57.961 E clusteroperator/olm condition/Available reason/OperatorcontrollerDeploymentOperatorControllerControllerManager_Deploying status/False OperatorcontrollerDeploymentOperatorControllerControllerManagerAvailable: Waiting for Deployment (exception: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-62517)
Nov 21 01:53:57.961 - 189s  E clusteroperator/olm condition/Available reason/OperatorcontrollerDeploymentOperatorControllerControllerManager_Deploying status/False OperatorcontrollerDeploymentOperatorControllerControllerManagerAvailable: Waiting for Deployment (exception: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-62517)
Nov 21 01:57:07.563 W clusteroperator/olm condition/Available reason/AsExpected status/True CatalogdDeploymentCatalogdControllerManagerAvailable: Deployment is available\nOperatorcontrollerDeploymentOperatorControllerControllerManagerAvailable: Deployment is available (exception: Available=True is the happy case)
Nov 21 02:13:42.162 W clusteroperator/olm condition/Available reason/AsExpected status/True CatalogdDeploymentCatalogdControllerManagerAvailable: Deployment is available\nOperatorcontrollerDeploymentOperatorControllerControllerManagerAvailable: Deployment is available (exception: Available=True is the happy case)
}
```

[1]. https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.21-e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade/1991653721427152896
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

Pipeline controller notification
This repository is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: automatic mode

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Nov 21, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@hongkailiu: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

In response to this:

See the failing job [1]:

: [Monitor:legacy-cvo-invariants][bz-OLM] clusteroperator/olm should not change condition/Available expand_less	2h10m52s
{  2 unexpected clusteroperator state transitions during e2e test run.  These did not match any known exceptions, so they cause this test-case to fail:

Nov 21 02:13:21.844 E clusteroperator/olm condition/Available reason/CatalogdDeploymentCatalogdControllerManager_Deploying::OperatorcontrollerDeploymentOperatorControllerControllerManager_Deploying status/False CatalogdDeploymentCatalogdControllerManagerAvailable: Waiting for Deployment\nOperatorcontrollerDeploymentOperatorControllerControllerManagerAvailable: Waiting for Deployment
Nov 21 02:13:21.844 - 20s   E clusteroperator/olm condition/Available reason/CatalogdDeploymentCatalogdControllerManager_Deploying::OperatorcontrollerDeploymentOperatorControllerControllerManager_Deploying status/False CatalogdDeploymentCatalogdControllerManagerAvailable: Waiting for Deployment\nOperatorcontrollerDeploymentOperatorControllerControllerManagerAvailable: Waiting for Deployment

4 unwelcome but acceptable clusteroperator state transitions during e2e test run.  These should not happen, but because they are tied to exceptions, the fact that they did happen is not sufficient to cause this test-case to fail:

Nov 21 01:53:57.961 E clusteroperator/olm condition/Available reason/OperatorcontrollerDeploymentOperatorControllerControllerManager_Deploying status/False OperatorcontrollerDeploymentOperatorControllerControllerManagerAvailable: Waiting for Deployment (exception: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-62517)
Nov 21 01:53:57.961 - 189s  E clusteroperator/olm condition/Available reason/OperatorcontrollerDeploymentOperatorControllerControllerManager_Deploying status/False OperatorcontrollerDeploymentOperatorControllerControllerManagerAvailable: Waiting for Deployment (exception: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-62517)
Nov 21 01:57:07.563 W clusteroperator/olm condition/Available reason/AsExpected status/True CatalogdDeploymentCatalogdControllerManagerAvailable: Deployment is available\nOperatorcontrollerDeploymentOperatorControllerControllerManagerAvailable: Deployment is available (exception: Available=True is the happy case)
Nov 21 02:13:42.162 W clusteroperator/olm condition/Available reason/AsExpected status/True CatalogdDeploymentCatalogdControllerManagerAvailable: Deployment is available\nOperatorcontrollerDeploymentOperatorControllerControllerManagerAvailable: Deployment is available (exception: Available=True is the happy case)
}

[1]. https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.21-e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade/1991653721427152896

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from deads2k and sjenning November 21, 2025 20:38
@hongkailiu
Copy link
Member Author

/payload-aggregate periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.21-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade 10

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 21, 2025

@hongkailiu: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.21-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/348676f0-c71a-11f0-9c80-290025f7f8cf-0

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e-aws-csi
/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
/test e2e-gcp-csi
/test e2e-gcp-ovn
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi
/test e2e-aws-csi
/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
/test e2e-gcp-csi
/test e2e-gcp-ovn
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi
/test e2e-aws-csi
/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
/test e2e-gcp-csi
/test e2e-gcp-ovn
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi

@hongkailiu
Copy link
Member Author

hongkailiu commented Nov 22, 2025

Screenshot 2025-11-24 at 15 41 14

/verified by "aggregator-periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.21-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade"

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Nov 22, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@hongkailiu: This PR has been marked as verified by "aggregator-periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.21-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade".

In response to this:

/verified by "aggregator-periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.21-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@neisw
Copy link
Contributor

neisw commented Nov 24, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 24, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 24, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hongkailiu, neisw

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 24, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e-aws-csi
/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
/test e2e-gcp-csi
/test e2e-gcp-ovn
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi
/test e2e-aws-csi
/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
/test e2e-gcp-csi
/test e2e-gcp-ovn
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi
/test e2e-aws-csi
/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
/test e2e-gcp-csi
/test e2e-gcp-ovn
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 25, 2025

@hongkailiu: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit fe7b13a into openshift:main Nov 25, 2025
20 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants